toxic Archives - Amazing Health Advances

Chemotherapy May Fuel Cancer Regrowth: New Research Reveals Disturbing Findings

The AHA! Team — Fri, 18 Jul 2025 05:27:38 +0000

Lori Alton via NaturalHealth365 – According to current statistics, about one million people a year (in the U.S. alone) undergo chemotherapy in an attempt to beat cancer. Yet this toxic treatment has a poor success rate in treating most kinds of cancer, and its benefits can be short-lived. Making the picture even grimmer is the fact that cancer recurrence after chemotherapy is frequently deadly. Now, from the front lines of cancer research comes the disturbing news that one particular type of chemotherapy can actually lead to cancer regrowth and recurrence. One approach to treating cancer creates a breeding ground for cancer stem cells Chemotherapy-induced senescence, often touted as a new weapon in cancer therapy, involves “putting cancer cells to sleep.” The protocol is intended to place cancer cells in a state of arrested growth, where they are alive but not dividing. While senescence is supposed to prevent further cancerous growth, new research shows that it can serve as a sort of “nursery” and safe harbor for cancer stem cells – the most dangerous and treatment-resistant type of cancer cells. A pair of recent studies reveal the consequences of therapy-induced senescence. In an explosive article published in Frontiers in Oncology, Markus Schosserer, Ph.D., wrote that there is ample evidence that senescent cancer cells can produce inflammatory molecules that promote a rich environment for cancer regrowth. In a breakthrough German study published in Nature, the team presented startling conclusions: senescence not only helps cancer cells avoid death but actually transforms them into cancer stem cells. This is very bad news, as stem cells – which can break from a tumor and metastasize throughout the body – are also the most resistant to treatment. Cancer cells can “outmaneuver” induced senescence In the German study, researchers examined human lymphoma cells treated with drugs to induce senescence and discovered they were developing “stemness.” In other words, the lymphoma cells started to express genes vital for maintaining stem cell function. When the team “released” the cancer cells from senescence, they discovered an alarming outcome. The cells began to multiply again – and more rapidly than those that had not become senescent. Although senescence is supposed to be irreversible, the team found evidence that cancer cells can escape it on their own – without the help of the genetic manipulation they used. Testament to this unfortunate possibility is that the scientists found more previously senescent stem cells in tumor patients after lymphoma recurred than had existed in the same individuals when they received their initial treatment. This demonstrated to the scientists that at least some cells had “figured out” how to outwit senescence. Noted professor of experimental oncology Dr. Jan Paul Medema commented, ‘There is compelling evidence … that … when cancer cells escape from senescence, they have an enhanced ability to drive tumor growth.’ Study leader Dr. Clemens A. Schmitt reported that switching off a specific cell signaling pathway could work to neutralize stemness in the previously senescent cells. However, there is no doubt that the study findings pose a definite setback for a formerly promising protocol. In addition, other studies have emerged showing that chemotherapy can do more harm than good. Chemotherapy for breast cancer can spread cancer cells A common protocol for breast cancer patients is to surgically remove tumors after chemo has been administered. The theory is that the chemo will help shrink the tumor while preventing the spread of cancer throughout the body. However, the treatment may accomplish the opposite effect. The toxic chemo drugs may actually switch on a repair mechanism – creating more blood vessel pathways and permitting tumors to grow back even stronger. In a study at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, researchers found that chemotherapy triggered the circulation of more cancer cells throughout the lungs and the body. Chemotherapy features toxic side effects The American Cancer Society acknowledges that chemotherapy damages healthy cells – and reports that chemotherapy side effects include vomiting, diarrhea, anemia, hair loss, fertility problems, chronic fatigue, and infections. Neutropenia, the most serious side effect, involves the depletion of white blood cells needed to fight diseases and infections. Weight changes and mood changes – with depression, memory loss, and inability to concentrate – may also occur. Normal cells damaged by chemotherapy Normal cells most likely to be damaged by chemotherapy are cells in hair follicles, blood-forming cells in the bone marrow, cells in the mouth and digestive tract, and cells in the reproductive system. Experts report that in some situations – for example, the early stages of colorectal cancer – chemotherapy has been shown to provide some benefit, granting extra years of life. But on the whole, chemotherapy yields disappointing results and may even exacerbate cancer cell growth – as shown in this pair of startling studies. Editor’s note: Discover the many natural ways to stop cancer cell growth, own the Stop Cancer Docu-Class created by NaturalHealth365 Programs. Sources for this article include: NIH.gov Medicalnewstoday.com Sciencedaily.com Cancer.org To read the original article click here.

The post Chemotherapy May Fuel Cancer Regrowth: New Research Reveals Disturbing Findings appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Early BPA Exposure Linked to Increased Risk of Heart Disease, Stroke, & Type 2 Diabetes

The AHA! Team — Wed, 16 Jul 2025 05:34:09 +0000

Patrick Tims via NaturalHealth365 – The pervasive presence of this toxic substance in everyday items creates a significant health threat. BPA (Bisphenol A), a colorless and soluble chemical, is likely within reach right now, as it’s commonly used in plastics and embedded in so many consumer products. The pervasive presence of this toxic substance in everyday items creates a significant health threat. A recent study in The Journal of Hazardous Materials links early BPA exposure to a higher risk of serious health issues, including type 2 diabetes, obesity, stroke, and heart disease. This early exposure can disrupt hormonal balance, leading to long-term consequences that extend well into adulthood. BPA is found in the most common consumer products BPA is found in food packaging, processed foods, consumer products, and even industrial items, making it nearly impossible to avoid. As an endocrine disruptor, this chemical alters hormones, increasing the risk of chronic diseases over time. Unfortunately, because it’s so widespread, exposure often begins early in life, during those crucial formative years. Research shows that BPA exposure in childhood sets the stage for cardiometabolic health issues that persist into adolescence and adulthood. By damaging blood vessels and the heart, BPA compromises the body’s ability to regulate weight, maintain healthy blood sugar levels, and process nutrients effectively, leading to long-term health challenges. A closer look at the BPA research that’s shaking up the health industry To better understand BPA exposure, the research team used direct and indirect methods to predict its impact. They cross-referenced food consumption diaries with demographic data, urine samples, and blood biomarkers, adjusting for key variables like overall energy intake. Participants were asked to provide detailed information about their food and drink choices, including when and where they consumed them and specifics like preparation methods, portion sizes, brand, and packaging. Because BPA exits the body quickly, 24-hour urine samples were analyzed to more accurately measure daily exposure. The team followed up at 4-, 7-, and 10-year intervals, with a 13-year follow-up for adolescents, to track the long-term effects of early exposure. BPA causes a multitude of health problems most aren’t aware of According to the study, BPA exposure is linked to increased fat mass, particularly around the waist, leading to a higher risk of abdominal obesity. This type of fat accumulation is especially concerning, as it’s associated with a greater risk of metabolic conditions like type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Additionally, BPA exposure can significantly impact insulin function, raising insulin resistance and levels in the body. This disrupts the body’s ability to regulate blood sugar effectively, which, over time, can lead to chronic conditions such as insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. The compound’s effects on metabolism can be subtle but serious, impacting long-term health in often overlooked ways. Tips to reduce BPA exposure If you have a child, or teen at home, reducing their exposure to BPA is essential. While BPA is widespread in consumer products, there are simple actions you can take to limit its presence in your home. When shopping, avoid processed foods and choose organic options instead. Once home, transfer food from plastic packaging into BPA-free containers, such as glass or stainless steel. To further reduce BPA exposure, minimize the use of plastics whenever possible. Opt for bulk items instead of those packaged in plastic and choose products with plastic-free packaging. By making these small changes, you can significantly lower your family’s BPA exposure and support healthier long-term outcomes. Sources for this article include: Sciencedirect.com Childrenshealthdefense.org To read the original article click here.

The post Early BPA Exposure Linked to Increased Risk of Heart Disease, Stroke, & Type 2 Diabetes appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Too Dangerous for Ice Cream, but “Safe” for Newborn Injections?

The AHA! Team — Fri, 20 Jun 2025 05:09:28 +0000

Edit Lang via NaturalHealth365 – A shocking double standard is emerging in the world of chemical safety that should outrage every parent. Scientists have recently published damning evidence that Polysorbate 80 (PS-80) – a synthetic emulsifier found in a wide range of products, including ice cream and salad dressing – accelerates intestinal aging and triggers severe metabolic dysfunction. Yet this same chemical is routinely injected directly into newborns through 22 different vaccines. The contradiction is staggering: If PS-80 is too dangerous to eat, how can health authorities claim it’s safe to bypass all natural defenses and inject it straight into developing babies? What’s really aging your gut from the inside out? A study published in Food Research International has revealed the devastating effects of PS-80 on intestinal health. Researchers have discovered that this ubiquitous food additive not only disrupts digestion but also accelerates the aging process at the cellular level. The study revealed PS-80’s sinister mechanism: it activates specific metabolic pathways that flood intestinal cells with toxic fats, triggering what scientists call “lipotoxicity.” This process generates massive amounts of free radicals and inflammatory compounds, essentially fast-forwarding intestinal aging. Essentially, PS-80 tricks your intestines into absorbing dangerous amounts of fats, creating a toxic environment that ages your gut decades faster than normal. Why is “too dangerous for food” somehow safe for a baby’s bloodstream? Here’s where the story gets truly disturbing. Food safety experts are increasingly calling for the elimination of PS-80 from processed foods due to mounting evidence of harm. KFF Health News recently published an exposé detailing how emulsifiers, such as PS-80, “alter the mix of bacteria in the gut, damage the lining of the gastrointestinal tract, and trigger inflammation.” Yet while food regulators debate removing PS-80 from your sandwich, vaccine manufacturers continue injecting it directly into children, including newborns on their first day of life. The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia admits PS-80 is present in 22 vaccines given to children or pregnant women, but dismisses concerns by claiming the amount is “comparable to an extremely tiny piece of a raisin.” This comparison is not only misleading but also dangerously irrelevant. Your stomach can filter it, but your bloodstream can’t Children’s Health Defense Senior Research Scientist Karl Jablonowski cuts through the regulatory doublespeak: “Anything that is injected bypasses our natural defenses. A substance that is unfit to ingest is certainly unfit to inject.” The science backs this up. Research shows PS-80 is significantly more toxic when injected compared to oral consumption. While your digestive system can partially filter ingested PS-80, injection delivers it directly into the muscle tissue and bloodstream, bypassing all natural protective barriers. Even more concerning, PS-80 crosses the blood-brain barrier. Pediatrician Dr. Lawrence Palevsky raises the obvious question: “What viral, bacterial, yeast, heavy metal, or other vaccine-containing ingredient needs to pass into the brains of our children?” Recent research reveals PS-80’s composition is far more variable and toxic than previously understood, containing up to 355 different compounds that can trigger immediate hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis. Day one of life: Is this really when we start poisoning babies? The timing of PS-80 exposure makes this controversy even more outrageous. Infants following the CDC’s recommended vaccine schedule are exposed to PS-80 at birth through RSV and hepatitis B shots, precisely when their detoxification systems are most vulnerable. New research published in the International Journal of Medical Sciences reveals that underdeveloped liver enzyme pathways in infants may make it harder for them to process toxic vaccine ingredients, potentially contributing to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). What you don’t know about hidden vaccine ingredients could kill Perhaps most disturbing is the potential for PS-80 to cause generational harm. The manufacturing process leaves behind sorbitol residues with known side effects, including dehydration, organ dysfunction, and metabolic disruption. To hide the resulting cloudiness in vaccines, manufacturers add undisclosed chemicals like organosiloxane and silicon dioxide – neither of which is required to be listed on labels. Dr. Arthur Brawer’s research suggests these hidden additives can amplify vaccine toxicity, potentially contributing to the epidemic of chronic autoimmune diseases plaguing our children. How to protect your family when regulators won’t You have more power than regulatory agencies want you to believe: Immediate actions: Eliminate processed foods containing PS-80 (check labels for “Polysorbate 80”) Choose whole, unprocessed foods that don’t require emulsifiers Research vaccine ingredients before consenting to injections for your children Demand transparency about all vaccine additives from healthcare providers Support your child’s detoxification systems with nutrient-dense foods Demand accountability: Question why substances deemed unsafe for food remain “safe” for injection Contact representatives about this regulatory double standard Support research into vaccine excipient safety Join advocacy groups demanding honest vaccine ingredient disclosure The time for blind trust is over The PS-80 paradox highlights a fundamental flaw in our regulatory system: chemicals can simultaneously be deemed “too dangerous” for ice cream yet considered “perfectly safe” for newborn injections. This contradiction should shatter any remaining faith in authorities who claim to protect our children while exposing them to known toxins. Every parent deserves honest answers about what’s being put into their children’s bodies. The emerging science on PS-80 demands immediate action – not more studies, not more delays, but real protection for our most vulnerable citizens. Whole Body Detox Summit If you’re ready to take control of your family’s toxic burden and support natural detoxification, Jonathan Landsman’s Whole Body Detox Summit brings together 27 leading experts who share proven strategies for safely removing these dangerous chemicals and protecting your children’s developing systems. The double standard ends when parents demand better. Your child’s health depends on seeing through the regulatory deception and taking action now. Sources for this article include: Sciencedirect.com Childrenshealthdefense.org To read the original article click here.

The post Too Dangerous for Ice Cream, but “Safe” for Newborn Injections? appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Tyson Foods Eliminates Toxic Synthetic Dyes Ahead of FDA Ban

The AHA! Team — Fri, 13 Jun 2025 05:10:35 +0000

Cassie B. via Natural News – The decision comes ahead of the FDA’s planned 2026 ban on six artificial dyes, signaling a growing industry shift toward cleaner ingredients. Tyson Foods will eliminate petroleum-based synthetic dyes from its products by the end of the month in a move praised by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as a step to protect children from health risks like ADHD. The FDA plans to ban six artificial dyes by 2026, with Tyson already reformulating most retail products, including chicken nuggets, to remove them. Kennedy applauded Tyson’s move, urging other companies to follow, as part of the Trump administration’s push to phase out harmful food additives. The FDA is cracking down on synthetic dyes linked to childhood health issues, with Commissioner Marty Makary citing rising diabetes, obesity, and ADHD cases. PepsiCo and other companies are also removing artificial colors, signaling industry-wide change driven by consumer demand and regulatory pressure. In a major victory for public health, Tyson Foods announced it will remove petroleum-based synthetic dyes from its products by the end of May in a move that has been praised by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as a critical step toward safeguarding children from harmful chemicals linked to ADHD, obesity, and other health risks. The decision comes ahead of the FDA’s planned 2026 ban on six artificial dyes, signaling a growing industry shift toward cleaner ingredients. A proactive response to health concerns During a May 5 earnings call, Tyson Foods CEO Donnie King revealed the company has been “proactively reformulating” its products to eliminate synthetic dyes, with most of its retail-branded items, including chicken nuggets, already free of the additives. None of Tyson’s school nutrition program offerings contain these dyes, aligning with Kennedy’s push for healthier food options for children. Kennedy, who has made food safety a cornerstone of his HHS agenda, applauded Tyson’s decision on social media: “I look forward to seeing more companies follow suit and put the health of Americans first. Together, we will make America Healthy Again.” His remarks underscore the Trump administration’s broader effort to phase out chemicals deemed hazardous by scientific studies. The FDA’s crackdown on harmful additives The FDA has targeted synthetic dyes due to mounting evidence linking them to neurobehavioral issues in children. In April, the agency announced plans to revoke authorization for Citrus Red No. 2 and Orange B, while urging manufacturers to eliminate six others, including Red No. 40 and Yellow No. 5, by 2026. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary emphasized the urgency, stating, “We have a new epidemic of childhood diabetes, obesity, depression, and ADHD. Given the growing concerns of doctors and parents about the potential role of petroleum-based food dyes, we should not be taking risks and do everything possible to safeguard the health of our children.” A 2021 California EPA report reinforced these concerns, noting a rise in ADHD diagnoses from 6.1% to 10.2% over two decades, with artificial dyes identified as a contributing factor. While the FDA maintains that current dye levels in food are “safe,” Kennedy and health advocates argue that precautionary action is necessary to protect vulnerable populations. Industry momentum builds Tyson’s announcement follows similar commitments from PepsiCo, which pledged to remove artificial colors from Lay’s and Tostitos by year’s end. The swift industry response suggests companies are eager to avoid regulatory penalties while capitalizing on consumer demand for cleaner labels. Kennedy’s hands-on approach, including a March meeting with food executives, has accelerated the timeline for change. “They said it’s going to take us a while,” he told CBS in April. “And I said they all have to be out within two years.” Tyson’s early compliance positions it as a leader in the sector, though critics note the move may also preempt stricter enforcement. A healthier future for American families Tyson’s decision marks a turning point in the fight against toxic food additives, demonstrating how federal pressure and consumer awareness can drive meaningful reform. As Kennedy’s HHS continues to prioritize transparency and science-based policies, families may soon see a food supply free of the dyes long suspected of harming children’s health. Sources for this article include: TheEpochTimes.com FoxNews.com KATV.com To read the original article, click here

The post Tyson Foods Eliminates Toxic Synthetic Dyes Ahead of FDA Ban appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Mercury-Leaching Fillings: The Dental Industry’s Toxic Secret

The AHA! Team — Fri, 06 Jun 2025 05:12:59 +0000

Lance D Johnson via Natural News – Despite knowing mercury’s toxicity, dentists continue to use silver amalgam fillings, which are approximately 50% mercury. The American Dental Association (ADA) insists on their safety, citing study after study. However, a closer look reveals these studies aren’t always referenced, and the ones that are, often exclude crucial details. Moreover, mercury’s volatility contradicts the ADA’s claim that it remains safely encapsulated within the filling. Silver amalgam fillings are the most common type of dental fillings, containing approximately 50% mercury by weight. Other components include silver, tin and copper. Mercury is classified as a neurotoxin, meaning it affects the nervous system. It’s also strongly connected to various health issues, including autoimmune disorders, respiratory problems, and neurological symptoms. The ADA maintains that amalgam fillings are safe, based on numerous studies. However, many studies cited by the ADA lack robust design or consider only short-term effects, while longer-term and high-quality studies often show negative impacts. Mercury in amalgam fillings does not stay encapsulated; it continually releases mercury vapor, especially under stress (chewing, brushing, drinking hot beverages) or when exposed to heat. Over time, these fillings lose a significant amount of their mercury content. As you sit in the dental chair, expecting a routine check-up, did you know that an everyday procedure could be silently poisoning you? For decades, the dental industry has been using fillings containing mercury, a potent neurotoxin, and downplaying its harmful effects. A growing body of evidence, however, paints a different picture. This investigation aims to unearth the truth about mercury in dental fillings and why it matters today. Why are dentists still using mercury? Despite knowing mercury’s toxicity, dentists continue to use silver amalgam fillings, which are approximately 50% mercury. The American Dental Association (ADA) insists on their safety, citing study after study. However, a closer look reveals these studies aren’t always referenced, and the ones that are, often exclude crucial details. Moreover, mercury’s volatility contradicts the ADA’s claim that it remains safely encapsulated within the filling. Key points: Mercury amalgam fillings contain 50% mercury, a known neurotoxin. The ADA supports their safety, citing inconclusive or incomplete studies. Mercury from fillings can leak, exposing patients, dentists, and techs to vapor. Everyday activities like chewing, brushing, or sipping hot drinks can release more mercury. The toxic truth of mercury fillings Mercury’s harm in dental fillings isn’t in question. The World Health Organization categorizes mercury’s adverse effects on health, including anxiety, depression, and neuro-inflammation. Yet, it’s still used in dentistry, exposing patients and dental professionals to toxic vapor. Disturbingly, the EPA’s mercury exposure limits for pregnant women are exceeded in nearly a third of those with amalgam fillings, as shown in a study by the IAOMT. Many patients develop mysterious symptoms attributed to mercury toxicity, such as fatigue, brain fog, and autoimmune disorders. Even oxidative stress and DNA damage are linked to mercury exposure. The FDA’s 2020 warning to avoid mercury fillings in certain groups is a step in the right direction. Still, critics argue it came decades too late and doesn’t go far enough. Mercury’s link to chronic health issues Patients and dental professionals may experience diverse symptoms related to mercury exposure, including: Neurological: Cognition issues, headaches, depression, anxiety. Respiratory: Wheezing, difficulty breathing. Autoimmune: Multiple sclerosis, alopecia, thyroid disorders. Cardiovascular: Heart issues, chest pains. Reproductive: Impotence, reduced fertility. DNA damage: Mercury can induce oxidative stress and DNA damage, contributing to various diseases, including cancer. FDA Warning: In 2020, the FDA issued a warning discouraging the use of amalgam fillings in certain at-risk groups, such as pregnant women and children. Mercury amalgam removal: Safe practices Standard procedures and risks: Conventional amalgam removal can result in significantly elevated mercury vapor levels, endangering patients and dental staff (Eley et al., 2014). Safe Mercury Amalgam Removal Technique (SMART): This protocol aims to minimize mercury exposure during filling removal. It involves using specialized equipment, such as high-volume suction devices, isolation, and proper waste disposal. The International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology (IAOMT) promotes the use of the SMART technique and advocates for safer dentistry. The dental industry’s continued use of mercury in fillings is alarming. Mercury’s toxicity is undeniable, and the ADA’s defense of its safety is unfounded. As patients, we deserve better. We must demand safer alternatives and hold the dental industry accountable for its use of known toxins. After all, our health, and potentially our lives, depend on it. Sources include: NaturalHealth365.com PRNewswire.com IAOMPT.org Pubmed.gov ScienceDirect.com To read the original article, click here

The post Mercury-Leaching Fillings: The Dental Industry’s Toxic Secret appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Bacteria Found to Eat Forever Chemicals & Even Some of Their Toxic Byproducts

The AHA! Team — Mon, 24 Mar 2025 05:36:09 +0000

University at Buffalo via EurekAlert! – University at Buffalo study shows that strain taken from contaminated soil breaks apart the strong carbon-fluorine bonds of PFAS, as well as some of the shorter-chain PFAS left behind In the quest to take the “forever” out of “forever chemicals,” bacteria might be our ally. Most remediation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) involves adsorbing and trapping them, but certain microbes can actually break apart the strong chemical bonds that allow these chemicals to persist for so long in the environment. Now, a University at Buffalo-led team has identified a strain of bacteria that can break down and transform at least three types of PFAS, and, perhaps even more crucially, some of the toxic byproducts of the bond-breaking process. A strain of bacteria that can break down and transform at least three types of PFAS Published in this month’s issue of Science of the Total Environment, the team’s study found that Labrys portucalensis F11 (F11) metabolized over 90% of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) following an exposure period of 100 days. PFOS is one of the most frequently detected and persistent types of PFAS and was designated hazardous by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency last year. The F11 bacteria also broke down a substantial portion of two additional types of PFAS after 100 days: 58% of 5:3 fluorotelomer carboxylic acid and 21% of 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate. The bond between carbon and fluorine atoms in PFAS is very strong “The bond between carbon and fluorine atoms in PFAS is very strong, so most microbes cannot use it as an energy source. The F11 bacterial strain developed the ability to chop away the fluorine and eat the carbon,” says the study’s corresponding author, Diana Aga, PhD, SUNY Distinguished Professor and Henry M. Woodburn Chair in the Department of Chemistry, within the UB College of Arts and Sciences, and director of the UB RENEW Institute. Unlike many prior studies on PFAS-degrading bacteria, Aga’s study accounted for shorter-chain breakdown products — or metabolites. In some cases, F11 even removed fluorine from these metabolites or broke them down to minute, undetectable levels. “Many previous studies have only reported the degradation of PFAS, but not the formation of metabolites. We not only accounted for PFAS byproducts but found some of them continued to be further degraded by the bacteria,” says the study’s first author, Mindula Wijayahena, a PhD student in Aga’s lab. The work was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health. Other collaborators include the Catholic University of Portugal, the University of Pittsburgh and the Waters Corp. Picky eaters learn to like PFAS PFAS are a group of ubiquitous chemicals widely used since the 1950s in everything from nonstick pans to fire-fighting materials. They’re far from the meal of choice for any bacterium, but some that live in contaminated soil have mutated to break down organic contaminants like PFAS so that they can use their carbon as an energy source. “If bacteria survive in a harsh, polluted environment, it’s probably because they have adapted to use surrounding chemical pollutants as a food source so they don’t starve,” Aga says. “Through evolution, some bacteria can develop effective mechanisms to use chemical contaminants to help them grow.” The bacterial strain used in this study, F11, was isolated from the soil of a contaminated industrial site in Portugal and had previously demonstrated the ability to strip fluorine from pharmaceutical contaminants. However, it had never been tested on PFAS. Collaborators from the Catholic University of Portugal placed F11 in sealed flasks with no carbon source aside from 10,000 micrograms per liter of PFAS. Following incubation periods of between 100 to 194 days, the samples were then shipped to UB, where analysis revealed that F11 had degraded some of the PFAS. The elevated levels of fluoride ions detected in these samples indicated that F11 had detached the PFAS’ fluorine atoms so that the bacteria could metabolize the carbon atoms. F11 was not only chopping PFOS into smaller pieces, but also removing the fluorine from those smaller pieces “The carbon-fluorine bond is what makes PFAS so difficult to break down, so to break them apart is a critical step. Crucially, F11 was not only chopping PFOS into smaller pieces, but also removing the fluorine from those smaller pieces,” Wijayahena says. Some of the metabolites left behind still contained fluorine, but after being exposed to PFOS for 194 days, F11 had even removed fluorine from three PFOS metabolites. “As a caveat, there could be other metabolites in these samples so miniscule that they elude current detection methods,” Aga says. Making PFAS a desirable menu item While UB researchers say their study is a good start, they caution that the F11 took 100 days to biodegrade a significant portion of the supplied PFAS, and there were no other carbon sources available for consumption. The team now plans to research how to encourage F11 to consume PFAS faster, even when there are competing energy choices that could increase their growth rate. “We want to investigate the impact of placing alternative carbon sources alongside the PFAS. However, if that carbon source is too abundant and easy to degrade, the bacteria may not need to touch the PFAS at all,” Aga says. “We need to give the F11 colonies enough food to grow, but not enough food that they lose the incentive to convert PFAS into a usable energy source.” Eventually, F11 could be deployed in PFAS-contaminated water and soil. This might involve creating conditions to grow the strain within activated sludge at a wastewater treatment plant, or even injecting the bacteria directly into the soil or groundwater of a contaminated site, a process called bioaugmentation. “In wastewater- activated sludge systems, you could accelerate removal of undesired compounds by adding a specific strain to the existing bacterial consortium in the treatment plants,” Aga says. “Bioaugmentation is a promising method that has not yet been explored for PFAS remediation in the environment.” Journal Science of The Total Environment DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178348 Method of Research To read the original article about Bacteria Found to Eat Forever Chemicals click here.

The post Bacteria Found to Eat Forever Chemicals & Even Some of Their Toxic Byproducts appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Common Cooking Oil Destroys Brains!?

The AHA! Team — Sun, 26 Jan 2025 06:26:38 +0000

Al Sears, MD, CNS – It’s cheap, flavorless, and the most popular oil in America… But it’s destroying your brain. I’m talking about cooking oil that comes from soybeans. For the past 20 years or so, clever marketers have made all kinds of outlandish health claims about soy. They tell you it’s organic, high in protein, heart-healthy, and even prevents diabetes. Sadly, the truth is that unless it’s fermented into a traditional Japanese dish called natto, soy is toxic. Studies show that soybean products are loaded with estrogen mimickers that cause erectile dysfunction, man boobs, loss of bone and muscle mass, as well as at least half a dozen different types of cancer. And scientists have known for years that soy does not prevent diabetes. In fact, it impairs insulin secretion and may actually result in diabetes.1 But even worse than soy is the oil that comes from it. Meanwhile, researchers at the University of California, Riverside, recently revealed that cooking with soybean oil can upregulate a number of genetic switches in the hypothalamus part of the brain, and trigger a range of neurological changes that can result in:2 Alzheimer’s Parkinson’s Mood swings Anxiety Depression Schizophrenia Your body simply wasn’t designed to consume soy. Sadly, that hasn’t prevented Big Agra from pushing it on millions of unsuspecting Americans as healthy. By selling soy as a “health food,” Big Agra’s marketers have turned soybeans into America’s favorite cooking oil. And the problem is not just about cooking with soybean oil – because it is already present in dozens of commercial foods. These include most salad dressings, baked goods, and the so-called “healthy” whole-grain breads. It’s even in baby formula. The UC Riverside study also found that soybean oil could induce obesity, insulin resistance, diabetes, and fatty liver disease in mice. In this study, the researchers compared soybean oils to coconut oil. Then they looked at the hypothalamus of the mice. This is a small, but critical area of the brain that affects numerous body functions. The research team found that the soybean oils – but not coconut oil – caused more than 100 genes in the brain to stop working as they should. You see, soybean oil is loaded with pro-inflammatory omega-6s, which act as a metabolic poison when consumed in excess.3 Additional studies show that cooking with coconut oil produces the fewest changes in hypothalamic genes, and therefore carries the least risk of causing neurological damage.4 I recommend my patients use coconut oil every day to improve their health. Studies show the medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs) in coconut oil can: Protect against heart disease5 Reduce insulin resistance6 Boost brain function in people with Alzheimer’s disease7 Reduce inflammation and arthritis8 Prevent osteoporosis9 Protect the liver10 3 Ways To Add More Coconut Oil To Your Diet Here are three ways you can get more coconut oil in your diet – and ditch soybean oil once and for all… Fry with it. Coconut oil has a high smoke point. That means that it won’t degrade at high temperatures — leaving all the fatty acids intact. It’s especially great for pan searing. If you do cook with it, consider getting it without flavor. This is known as “expeller-pressed” coconut oil. Make a smoothie. Scoop a healthy serving of coconut oil (it’ll probably be solid, but that’s okay) into the blender. Mix in your favorite fresh fruits. Maybe even add some protein powder. Add organic milk and a little ice. Blend it all and enjoy a tasty, heart-healthy smoothie. Take it to go. This delicious and healthy trail mix is great for people on the go. Here’s how to make it… Ingredients: 1 cup almonds 1 cup cashews ¼ cup raw shelled pumpkin seeds ½ cup unsweetened coconut flakes ¼ cup coconut oil (melted) ½ cup raw honey 1 tsp vanilla extract 1 tsp Himalayan pink salt 1 cup dried fruit (optional) Directions: Preheat oven to 275 F. Place the almonds, cashews, pumpkin seeds, sunflower seeds, and coconut flakes in a food processor or blender. Pulse a few times to break into chunks. Place the coconut oil, raw honey, and vanilla extract in a medium saucepan over medium-high heat and allow to melt. Stir to combine, then add the ground nut mixture. Stir until everything is fully coated. Spread the trail mix evenly onto a baking sheet lined with parchment paper. Cook for 25-30 minutes until lightly browned, stirring once or twice. Remove from the oven, add the dried fruit, and sprinkle with sea salt. Press the mixture together firmly to form a tight, flat surface. Cool for 20-30 minutes or until fully hardened. Break into chunks. Store it in an airtight container. It will keep for up to a week. References: Deol P, et al. “Soybean oil is more obesogenic and diabetogenic than coconut oil and fructose in mouse: potential role for the liver.” PLoS One. 2015 Jul 22;10(7):e0132672. Deol P, et al. “Dysregulation of hypothalamic gene expression and the oxytocinergic system by soybean oil diets in male mice.” Endocrinology. 2020; 161(2). Patterson, E et al. “Health implications of high dietary omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids.” J Nutr Metab. 2012:539426. Deol P, et al. “Dysregulation of Hypothalamic gene expression and the oxytocinergic system by soybean oil diets in male mice.” Endocrinology. February 2020. 161(2). Khaw KT, et al. “Randomised trial of coconut oil, olive oil or butter on blood lipids and other cardiovascular risk factors in healthy men and women.” BMJ Open. 2018;(8)3:e020167. Han JR, et al. “Effects of dietary medium-chain triglyceride on weight loss and insulin sensitivity in a group of moderately overweight free-living type 2 diabetic Chinese subjects.” Metabolism. 2007;56(7):985-991. De la Rubia Orti JE, et al. “Improvement of main cognitive functions in patients with Alzheimer’s disease after treatment with coconut-oil enriched Mediterranean diet: A pilot study.” J Alzheimer’s Dis. July 20, 2018. Vysakh A, et al. “Polyphenolics isolated from virgin coconut oil inhibits adjuvant induced arthritis in rats through antioxidant and anti-inflammatory action.” Int Immunopharmacol. 2014;20(1):124-130. Hayatullina Z, et al. “Virgin coconut oil supplementation prevents bone loss in osteoporosis rat model.” Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:237236. Otuechere CA, et al. “Virgin coconut oil protects against liver damage in albino rats challenged with the anti-folate combination, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.”.J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2014;25(2):249-253. To read the original article click here.

The post Common Cooking Oil Destroys Brains!? appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Glyphosate Exposure Linked to Increased Risk of Kidney Disease

The AHA! Team — Mon, 04 Nov 2024 06:23:21 +0000

Lori Alton via NaturalHealth365 – An epidemic has been growing around the world, yet it remains largely unacknowledged in the United States. This epidemic is chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology (CKDu). Countless individuals from South America to Asia have been affected, with many tragically losing their lives to this so-called “mysterious” disease. In El Salvador, CKDu has become a leading cause of death among men, surpassing other serious illnesses like leukemia, AIDS, HIV, and diabetes combined. Recently, a study published in Science of the Total Environment highlighted a concerning connection between glyphosate exposure and kidney injury, particularly in children living near farming areas. This raises important questions about the environmental factors contributing to CKDu and what we need to understand about this troubling health crisis. Western medicine fails to properly address chronic kidney disease Little has been done in the U.S. to combat the sudden surge of this deadly disease – which has only appeared in the past couple of decades. In fact, many American doctors still question whether it’s such a “big deal” or not. But, for the many people who have lost their loved ones to CKDu – the disease is very real. One man from Sri Lanka – Dr. Channa Jayasumana – worked with two colleagues to investigate the source of CKDu in his country. To start, the team recognized that CKDu is affiliated with kidney tubule damage, which is not normally found in patients with chronic kidney disease brought on by diet or conditions like hypertension. They also assumed that because the disease first appeared in the mid-1990s, a toxic agent must have been introduced to the country sometime within the previous 30 years to have led to kidney damage. Finally, the substance had to protect heavy metals in groundwater and safely transport them through the liver and into the kidneys. Their research led them to glyphosate, an herbicide that meets all the criteria for the offending agent and is used widely throughout Sri Lanka. First developed to remove mineral build-up in boiler pipes, glyphosate was never intended to be used in farming. It was only a matter of time before one company – Monsanto (acquired by Bayer) – discovered glyphosate’s “benefits” as a weed killer. Glyphosate has an ugly and destructive history Monsanto was quick to patent glyphosate as an herbicide in the 1970s. For decades, the company owned exclusive rights and sold it as a product called Roundup, now the most popular herbicide globally. Though widely touted as a “safe” herbicide, weeds have developed in recent years that are resistant to Roundup and, thus, require greater and more toxic amounts of herbicide. So, Monsanto created glyphosate-resistant GMO seeds that are resistant to the herbicide. Now, farmers can use extravagant amounts of this herbicide, destroying weeds without damaging the crops. Unfortunately, the farmers themselves seem to have suffered the repercussions of glyphosate toxicity, losing their lives to a disease that may have been prevented. Farmers are paying the ultimate price for ignorance Glyphosate is a substance that binds with metals in soils, such as arsenic. In the body, glyphosate is believed to protect metals from being metabolized by the liver, allowing them to become toxic within the kidneys. While genetically modified seeds resist glyphosate, there is no protection for the farmers who become ill after exposure to this substance as it binds with heavy metals. Unfortunately, dialysis and organ transplants aren’t as accessible in parts of the world most affected by CKDu, meaning most farmers with the disease caused by glyphosate toxicity will lose their lives to it. Editor’s note: If you’re looking for the science that proves how toxic glyphosate is, own the Fatty Liver Docu-Class, created by NaturalHealth365 Programs and watch the presentation with Jonathan Landsman and Stephanie Seneff, PhD. Sources for this article include: NIH.gov Sciencedaily.com Truth-out.org To read the original article click here.

The post Glyphosate Exposure Linked to Increased Risk of Kidney Disease appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

The Chronic Effects of Low-Dose Mercury Exposure

The AHA! Team — Mon, 03 Jun 2024 05:12:24 +0000

Lori Alton via NaturalHealth365 – Although mercury can enter the body through contaminated seafood, vaccines, and emissions from factories and coal power plants, the main source of exposure is dental amalgams. Natural health experts are sounding the alarm on chronic (low-level) mercury exposure, calling it a “biochemical train wreck” and an “under-recognized epidemic.” Mercury, a known neurotoxin, binds to molecules, tissues, and cells in the body and sets the stage for a host of serious chronic diseases – although both the American Dental Association and the FDA continue to minimize and deny its toxic effects. Yet, there are millions and millions of people suffering from mercury poisoning, and neurodevelopmental disorders have surged by over 30 percent in the last decade. What you need to know about mercury exposure Although mercury can enter the body through contaminated seafood, vaccines, and emissions from factories and coal power plants, the main source of exposure is dental amalgams. The World Health Organization (WHO) notes that the typical absorbed dose from amalgams is 100 micrograms a day. One of the most disturbing facts about mercury exposure is its association with neurological disorders, behavioral problems, autism spectrum disorder, and mental illness. Many experts point to the soaring rates of neurodevelopmental disorders in this country as a testament to the toxic effects of mercury. Mercury, which can destroy the protective myelin sheath that covers the nerves, is highly damaging to the neurological system. In fact, researchers report that autism is often accompanied by oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and increased inflammation – all of which are consistent with mercury poisoning. In addition, mercury exposure can cause deficiencies and imbalances of essential minerals such as zinc and copper, a condition associated with ADHD. Mercury exposure also interferes with the production and function of various neurotransmitters, including the “calming” body chemical GABA – thereby promoting the development of depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders. Mercury interferes with antioxidant defenses Chronic mercury exposure also depletes nutrients in the body, promoting oxidative stress and interfering with antioxidant defenses. Mercury’s ability to bind to sulfur and selenium severely limits the beneficial oxidation-fighting and cancer-fighting effects of these antioxidant minerals. This interferes with the immune system’s ability to identify cancerous cells and causes it to attack normal, healthy cells, triggering the development of autoimmune disease and cancer. Mercury also binds to glutathione, the body’s premier antioxidant, which is designed to detoxify mercury and other heavy metals. In addition, mercury attacks the disulfide bonds in collagen, triggering arthritis and connective tissue disorders while also damaging the cell mitochondria that synthesize energy. Mercury exposure promotes cardiovascular and digestive diseases Mercury exposure contributes to heart disease by causing the oxidation of blood vessels and creating endothelial dysfunction. In one study of patients with heart failure, mercury levels in the myocardium, or middle layer of the heart wall, were found to be 22,000 times higher than normal. Mercury alters intestinal flora, increasing the presence of undesirable bacteria and pathogens such as candida. Digestion is impaired because of mitochondrial dysfunction. Mercury also increases the risk of food sensitivities, especially gluten and casein, and contributes to a “leaky gut.” As if this weren’t damaging enough, chronic exposure to mercury is linked with insulin resistance, hypoglycemic symptoms, and metabolic syndrome – a constellation of unhealthy conditions that include high blood pressure, high blood sugar, excess abdominal fat, and excess levels of LDL cholesterol. Susceptibility to mercury varies with the individual Vulnerability to mercury depends on a variety of factors, including exposure, nutrient status, lifestyle, and genetics. Over the last ten years, however, researchers have documented over a dozen common genetic variations that cause increased vulnerability to mercury toxicity – and many more are likely in existence. It can be difficult to diagnose mercury toxicity, as mercury can accumulate throughout the body without showing up in blood, urine, or hair. In addition, symptoms of mercury toxicity are common to many other illnesses and may appear long after exposure. Following a nutrient-dense diet and taking supplements advised by a knowledgeable holistic physician can help modulate the effects of mercury exposure. But, the bottom line is: if you have mercury-based, “silver” fillings in your mouth … get them removed (as soon as possible) by a qualified (holistic) dentist and begin the process of mercury detoxification – slowly and consistently. You can search for a holistic dentist at this web site: IAOMT.org. In addition, in terms of good food, high-quality fats, organ meats such as liver, organic olive oil, and bone broth can help replace depleted minerals and amino acids, while probiotic foods such as sauerkraut and kimchi can help restore the balance of friendly bacteria in the intestine. Foods high in vitamin C can provide antioxidant benefits and rebuild damaged collagen, with Brazil nut, sesame, and pine nuts helping to replace magnesium, zinc, and selenium. Obviously, if you’ve been poisoned with mercury, the process of detoxification will take some time and effort. But, remember, your future health depends on you taking action today. Editor’s note: Discover the best ways to remove toxic mercury from the mouth and correct other dental problems, own the Holistic Oral Health Summit created by NaturalHealth365 Programs. Sources for this article include: NIH.gov Townsendletter.com To read the original article click here.

The post The Chronic Effects of Low-Dose Mercury Exposure appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.