slow the spread Archives - Amazing Health Advances

‘Lockdowns Are a Big Mistake:’ World Health Organization and Other Experts Now ADMIT Global Economic Shutdowns for COVID-19 Are WRONG

AHA Publisher — Mon, 19 Oct 2020 07:00:04 +0000

Sara Middleton via NaturalHealth365 – In a reversal few saw coming but most understand, officials from the World Health Organization (WHO) has finally condemned the global economic shutdowns. Far from saving people’s lives, these shutdowns have in their estimation caused “irreparable damage” to citizens of the world – especially the most vulnerable among us – and have sparked a concerning upward trend of poverty and mental health issues. The concern is so widespread and severe that epidemiologists from Stanford University, Oxford University, and Harvard University have put together a petition calling to finally end the unethical madness of COVID lockdowns. WHO ADMITS: COVID lockdowns made “poor people an awful lot poorer” and may double the rates of malnutrition In an interview with British media outlet The Spectator, Dr. David Nabarro of the WHO admitted that “we…do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of [the novel coronavirus pandemic].” Are you surprised, Governor Newsom and Governor Cuomo?! According to Dr. Nabarro, an unavoidable consequence of the lockdown has been “making poor people an awful lot poorer….It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition.” He cites economic devastation in regions like the Caribbean as examples of the profound mess lockdowns and travel restrictions have caused. Mental health consequences of these ill-advised and protracted shutdowns cannot be ignored, either. For example, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced in August that there were “considerably elevated adverse mental health conditions associated with COVID-19,” with fully 40% of American adults struggling with worsening mental health, increased thoughts of suicide, and increased use of drugs and alcohol. “The only time we believe a lockdown is justified,” Dr. Nabarro continued in The Spectator, “is to buy you time to reorganise, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.” And as battered as the WHO’s reputation may be, their concerns are fully supported by a growing collection of international experts from the fields of epidemiology, finance, public health, psychiatry, and more. “The Great Barrington Declaration” makes these key points about ending the economic shutdowns … can we call on our local and national leaders to pay attention? Spearheaded by Ivy league professors, a petition called the Great Barrington Declaration is making its rounds and currently features over 40,000 signatures. It calls to end the current lockdown policies which “are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health.” Here are a few key points from the petition: The lockdowns are contributing to “worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health,” among other issues – the effects of which will be felt for years to come COVID-19 is less dangerous for children than the seasonal flu (which the CDC isn’t even surveilling right now, according to their website); it follows that keeping kids out of school is considered a “grave injustice” Indeed, continuing the lockdown for everyone is unconscionable – extracurricular activities, schools, restaurants, and businesses should be open and “those who are not vulnerable” (that is, anyone who is not old or chronically ill) should be “immediately” allowed to “resume life as normal“ Lastly, say what you will about “herd immunity,” but an important point should not be lost here: this cohort of the world’s leading epidemiologists and physicians admit that building of coronavirus immunity throughout the population is “notdependent” on a vaccine. Therefore, holding the world hostage until a vaccine is available is simply not the way to minimize deaths and social harm. Time will tell when world leaders will finally pay attention and heed these dire warnings. Sources for this article include: Infectioncontroltoday.com, CDC.gov, GBDeclaration.org, News.com.au, CDC.gov To read the original article click here. For more articles from NaturalHealth365 click here.

The post ‘Lockdowns Are a Big Mistake:’ World Health Organization and Other Experts Now ADMIT Global Economic Shutdowns for COVID-19 Are WRONG appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Corona Means No Face Touching. Science Shows We Can’t Help It

AHA Publisher — Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:00:01 +0000

Israel21c Staff – Throughout this whole corona crisis, we’ve been repeatedly told to avoid touching our faces so as not to transmit or catch the virus. But if you too have been unable to stop putting your hand to your face, it might be because you’re busy getting a sense of yourself. And you’re not alone. A study carried out by Weizmann Institute scientists that was recently published in the Royal Society journal Philosophical Transactions B suggested that humans touch their faces in order to self-smell, and that this self-smelling is a mechanism through which we manage to get a sense of self. Given that face-touching could be responsible for transferring nearly 25 percent of respiratory illnesses, the researchers set out to resolve while we still do so. Through an online questionnaire, they received 404 responses from 137 men and 260 women aged 19 to 74 across 19 countries, who provided a report on their sniffing habits. A whopping 94.31% of respondents reported sniffing their own hands. Meanwhile, an honest 91.58% said they did the same with their armpits. Combining the questionnaire results with other experiments and studies, the researches came to believe that while humans also sniff their hands to obtain information on other people they touched, we primarily do so to provide information on intrinsic sources. Some of the sniffing, they say, is conscious, and has to do with making sure we “don’t smell bad” or even to detect signs of disease. But on a subconscious level, they note, humans sniff themselves to form a sense of self. “We think that in sniffing our own body, we are subconsciously obtaining an external reflection and reassurance of self,” they wrote. “Given that mirrors have not been around since the dawn of humanity, a sense of self can likely be formed without one at hand. We propose that the path by which humans could have always observed themselves to get a notion of self is by olfaction.” In an apparent nod to our corona-stricken times, the study’s authors invited readers to take part in a personal, at-home experiment: next time you participate in an online meeting or seminar, they suggest, take your eyes off the speaker and check out the audience instead. Count how many people are touching their faces, specifically their noses, and you’ll see that a large amount of people are doing exactly that. Moreover, they add, you’ll be able to spot people sniffing. And no wonder, may we add — never-ending Zoom meetings most certainly have us reaching to check that we’re still all there. To read the original article click here. For more articles from Israel21c click here.

The post Corona Means No Face Touching. Science Shows We Can’t Help It appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Israel Pilots First-Ever Disinfectant Tunnel for Public Spaces

AHA Publisher — Sat, 06 Jun 2020 07:00:17 +0000

Naama Barak via Israel21c – Sanitation tunnel that mists incomers with disinfectant solution being piloted at Tel Aviv’s Bloomfield Stadium. In a post-lockdown world, the idea of entering crowded shopping malls or sports stadiums is thrilling yet somewhat petrifying. But since public spaces can’t be avoided forever, it’s good to know they can be made safer. One Israeli company doing just that is RD PACK. Usually in the business of constructing automatic machines that move, pack and store products, it created a sanitation tunnel that sprays incomers with a disinfectant solution to provide protection against bacteria and viruses, including corona-type viruses. One such sanitation tunnel is now being piloted at the entrance to Bloomfield Stadium in Tel Aviv. It will remain until the end of soccer season, even though games are currently being held without an audience. The tunnel can also be placed at the entrance to other public spaces such as hospitals, airports, schools or office buildings. Its automatic system senses when someone is walking through the tunnel and turns on misting nozzles that spray the space with the disinfectant solution. The saturated environment of the tunnel means that every facet of the people or objects passing through are sanitized, even if they’re not directly exposed to the misting nozzles. The disinfectant solution being used in the tunnel is one that was developed by chemists Eran Avraham and Izaak Cohen at Bar-Ilan University, in which tap water can be turned into a powerful yet environmentally friendly disinfectant on demand. According to its developers, the water-based solution is safe for skin and does not contaminate groundwater. Its bacteria-killing properties were proved in tests carried out in Israeli hospitals and has also proved effective in neutralizing corona-type viruses. To read the original article click here. For more articles from Israel21c click here.

The post Israel Pilots First-Ever Disinfectant Tunnel for Public Spaces appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

US Coronavirus Measures Are Justified, University of Wyoming Economists Find

AHA Publisher — Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:00:30 +0000

University of Wyoming via EurekAlert – Aggressive social distancing policies being used to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus COVID-19 are hammering the U.S. economy, but an analysis by University of Wyoming researchers suggests that these measures are economically justified. The potential benefits of social distancing in saving lives far outweigh the projected damage to the economy, according to the economists from the Department of Economics in the UW College of Business. The team’s research, which has received widespread attention in national and international media outlets, will appear in the Journal of Benefit Cost Analysis. “Our benefit-cost analysis shows that the extensive social distancing measures being adopted in the U.S. likely do not constitute an overreaction,” says Assistant Professor Linda Thunstrom, lead author of the article. “Social distancing saves lives but comes at large costs to society due to reduced economic activity. Still, based on our benchmark assumptions, the economic benefits of lives saved substantially outweigh the value of the projected losses to the U.S. economy.” In fact, assuming that social distancing measures are adopted widely enough to substantially reduce contacts among individuals, the benefits of those policies will outweigh the economic costs by $5.2 trillion, the economists found. Joining Thunstrom in conducting the analysis were Assistant Professor Stephen Newbold, Professors David Finnoff and Jason Shogren, and graduate student Madison Ashworth. The team used the most up-to-date information on disease spread and effects on economic activity to conduct the analysis. “It should be possible to conduct a more detailed analysis after more data are available,” Newbold says. “But a rapid assessment, based on the best currently available information, adds much-needed rigor to the public discussion about the policy response to this outbreak.” Attempts to slow the rate of COVID-19 infections have led many governments around the world to issue unprecedented public policies and guidelines to increase social distance within and across countries. Those measures include closing schools and businesses, imposing broad travel restrictions, and urging citizens to avoid gatherings of 10 or more people. A recent forecast by Goldman Sachs predicts that these actions will cause the nation’s gross domestic product to shrink by more than 6 percent this year, even with substantial government stimulus efforts. Already, the country is seeing declines in economic activity and dramatic increases in unemployment, with a particular impact on vulnerable low-income workers. The UW economists’ analysis takes into account the potential impact of COVID-19 on the U.S. health care system. Based on previous studies by other researchers, they estimate that the current social distancing measures across the country will reduce the average contact rate among individuals by 38 percent, which reduces the peak of the infection curve by more than half. This would help to avoid overwhelming the health care system and keep the mortality rate lower than the worst-case scenarios. The economists note that their analysis doesn’t examine the impacts of social distancing policies on specific segments of the U.S. population. “It stands to reason that the most vulnerable groups in society will be the hardest hit. For example, the service industry will be disproportionately affected by these policies, which will lead to mass layoffs of low-income workers,” the researchers wrote. “It also is likely that the most economically disadvantaged groups will suffer the most severe adverse health consequences from COVID-19.” In theory, the disparate impact of the epidemic and social distancing measures could be addressed “with appropriate redistributions of resources,” they wrote. The analysis also doesn’t consider how the current social distancing measures might affect the probability of a second wave of COVID-19 infections. “Instead, we implicitly assume that aggressive social distancing measures buy enough time to develop and distribute cost-effective COVID-19 treatments or vaccines, should a second wave occur,” the economists wrote. In the end, it is in the nation’s interest to better prepare for outbreaks such as COVID-19, they say. “Our analysis suggests that the aggressive social distancing policies currently promoted in the U.S. probably are justified, given that no good contingency plans were in place for an epidemic of this magnitude,” they wrote. “But the costs and consequences will be painful. To avoid these in the future, there are likely large social benefits to ensuring that we are better prepared for the next pandemic.” To read the original article click here.

The post US Coronavirus Measures Are Justified, University of Wyoming Economists Find appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Do’s and Don’ts of Fabric COVID-19 Masks and Gloves

AHA Publisher — Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:00:26 +0000

Dr. Don Colbert – Face masks are now recommended to the general public by the CDC to slow the spread of COVID-19. But, it’s extremely important that they are worn correctly and that social distancing is not ignored while masks are on. Here are the do’s and don’t of COVID-19 masks and gloves. Make sure you’re doing it right to keep yourself and your family safe. Why Wear Masks? As you know the COVID-19 Coronavirus is a novel virus, and we humans do not have immunity to it. This makes it much different than the seasonal flu or other coronaviruses that were not novel. As you know the COVID-19 Coronavirus is a novel virus, and we humans do not have immunity to it. This makes it much different than the seasonal flu or other coronaviruses that were not novel. We now know that COVID-19 is extremely contagious and spreads incredibly fast. The main cause of spread is through airborne droplets, either directly spewed onto us or those lingering in the air. COVID-19 can also be encountered on surfaces and spread to our hands, faces, and bodies. In addition, we also know that COVID-19 is being spread by asymptomatic people. Some individuals simply do not display symptoms, or have very mild symptoms, even when they are infected with COVID-19. Without everyone taking precautions, we simply won’t know who has the virus and who doesn’t until we can all be tested. How Masks Slow the Spread of COVID-19 COVID-19 masks create a barrier to stop, or at least reduce the number of droplets that exit one body from a cough, sneeze, or even talking. In fact, a study from Hong Kong and the University of Maryland found that simple surgical masks, even those that didn’t fit particularly well, blocked 100% of viral droplets and some aerosol particles from infected individuals (compared to when they were not wearing masks). Their 111 participants were infected with influenza, rhinovirus, and mild coronaviruses). When the participant didn’t wear a mask and exhaled, contagious droplets lingered in the air 30% of the time (1). However, since our health care workers desperately need all the surgical masks they can get, the public has resorted to fabric masks. But, do they work? And, what can you do to make them as effective as possible? Do Cloth COVID-19 Masks Work? Studies on different airborne illnesses have found that fabric offers little protection. However, a little protection is still better than no protection IF other recommendations are still followed. One report from 2013 found that surgical masks were 3 times more effective than fabric at stocking the spread of viruses (2). Another study found concluded the same and found that fabric was somewhat effective, even if 3 times less than surgical (3). Why is fabric less protective? Fabric is more porous and allows more droplets through than surgical mask material. What’s more, it can actually “hold” the moisture of a cough or sneeze to you. This may actually be slightly advantageous though, as the droplets are “held” rather than spewed forward, at least slightly decreasing the potential transmission. Most experts agree that fabric masks have the potential to reduce outgoing germs, even if they aren’t effective at stopping incoming germs as well. If everyone wears masks and slows outgoing germs, as a whole, they can be effective. Make Cloth COVID-19 Masks More Effective There are a few ways to make your masks, and wearing them, more effective. Use 2 pieces of fabric sewn together, rather than one layer, for a mask. Do your best to make a mask that is tight-fitting over your mouth and nose. Use heavy cotton or flannel rather than a more breathable fabric to reduce pore size. Avoid touching your face – remove your mask from the back of your head after washing or sanitizing your hands. Wash your mask in hot water, in a washing machine after every excursion into the public if possible. If able to steam clean it in your machine, this can be effective for sterilization (4). When in public, sanitize your hands before and after leaving your car, every time. Continue to social distance at least 6+ feet from others when in public. Continue to stay home as much as possible. If you are sick or showing symptoms, stay home if possible. If you are at high risk for severe COVID-19 symptoms, stay home if possible. Should You Wear Gloves? Gloves are only effective at slowing the spread of the virus when removed and discarded after every surfaced touched. Otherwise, they can spread the virus to your face or other surfaces the same as your hands. If they are thrown away after every pubic surface and/or person encounter, they are effective. If not, you will likely slow the spread more effectively by santizing your hands after every public surface encounter. organisms isolated from coughs of healthy volunteers wearing their homemade mask, a surgical mask, or no mask was compared using several air-sampling techniques. Bottom Line Collectively, fabric COVID-19 masks can slow the spread of COVID-19 in the public from both asymptomatic and symptomatic carriers by reducing outgoing germs. They are not as effective as surgical masks, though, and those at high risk of severe COVID-19 should still stay home if possible to reduce the risk of infection (as should those with COVID-19 or symptoms). In addition, all recommendations for not touching your face, staying home, and social distancing should still be adhered to, whether wearing a mask or not. Frequent handwashing, and santizing hands before and after all public encounters can also reduce infection. To read the original article click here. For more information from Dr. Colbert click here.

The post Do’s and Don’ts of Fabric COVID-19 Masks and Gloves appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.