mRNA Archives - Amazing Health Advances

Yale Study Finds Spike Proteins from COVID Jabs Persist for TWO YEARS: Are mRNA Vaccines Rewriting Human DNA?

The AHA! Team — Mon, 17 Feb 2025 06:06:15 +0000

Lance D Johnson via Natural News – Researchers find spike proteins in vaccinated individuals TWO YEARS after inoculation. Yale scientists find COVID spike protein in vaccinated individuals up to two years post-vaccination. Study suggests mRNA genetic material may integrate with human DNA, activating protein-making structures. Renowned scientist Dr. Akiko Iwasaki, who initially supported mRNA vaccines, now leads the study. Vaccine skeptics warn of DNA contamination risks, citing evidence of self-replicating mRNA and reverse transcription. Research reveals mRNA vaccines may induce chronic inflammation, blood clotting, and neurological damage. Findings challenge claims of temporary, localized mRNA effects, raising concerns about long-term health impacts. Evidence suggests vaccinated individuals may become “super spreaders” of spike proteins, potentially endangering public health. Researchers find spike proteins in vaccinated individuals TWO YEARS after inoculation Scientists are raising alarms about the long-term consequences of these experimental COVID-19 injections. New findings from Yale University suggest that the genetic material in mRNA vaccines may not only persist in the human body but could also integrate with human DNA, fundamentally altering our genetic code. This disturbing discovery has profound implications for the health of billions of people worldwide and raises urgent questions about the ethics and safety of mRNA vaccine technology. Yale researchers have identified COVID spike proteins in the blood of vaccinated individuals — up to two years after they received their shots. Crucially, these individuals were never infected with the virus, as confirmed by antibody tests. The immune system typically destroys newly produced spike proteins, but the persistence of these proteins suggests that some vaccinated individuals may be producing them independently. A plausible explanation is that the genetic material delivered by the vaccines has integrated with human genes, activating protein-making structures within cells. If confirmed, this would mark a seismic shift in our understanding of mRNA vaccine safety. The implications of this discovery are staggering. More than a billion people worldwide have received mRNA COVID vaccines, and the possibility that these vaccines are altering human DNA is a game-changer. The consequences could extend far beyond the immediate health risks of Covid-19, potentially leading to chronic inflammation, autoimmune disorders, and long-term organ damage. The spike proteins produced by these vaccines are not benign; they are known to cause blood clotting, neurological inflammation, and even prion-like formations in the brain, which are linked to Alzheimer’s disease. The lead researcher on this groundbreaking study is Dr. Akiko Iwasaki, a renowned immunologist and former president of the American Association of Immunologists. Dr. Iwasaki was once a vocal advocate for mRNA vaccines, dismissing concerns about their safety as “absurd.” However, her team’s findings now suggest that those concerns may have been valid all along. The study, known as LISTEN, began in 2022 and has enrolled approximately 3,000 participants who reported post-vaccine injuries. The researchers have found spike proteins in participants’ blood samples more than 700 days after their last mRNA shot, a finding that challenges the narrative of temporary, localized mRNA effects. Welcome to the dark side of transhumanism The possibility of genetic integration is not a new concern among vaccine skeptics. Some researchers have long warned that the mRNA vaccines could contaminate human DNA, a process known as “transfection.” The manufacturing process of mRNA vaccines involves the use of DNA plasmids, which can lead to small amounts of DNA contamination in the final product. While federal standards limit allowable DNA contamination to 10 nano grams per dose, the lipid nanoparticles used to protect the mRNA may also shield the DNA contaminants, potentially allowing them to integrate into human genes. Recent research by Kevin McKernan and others has provided further evidence of DNA contamination in vaccine vials, raising questions about the adequacy of current regulatory standards. Dr. Richard M. Fleming, a nuclear cardiologist, has also warned that mRNA vaccines are self-replicating and may turn individuals into “never-ending spike protein factories.” His research suggests that the genetic sequence for SARS-CoV-2 is designed to self-assemble and self-amplify, integrating into human DNA through reverse transcription. This process could hijack healthy genetic expression, leading to chronic inflammation and organ damage for years to come. The consequences of these findings are nothing short of alarming. Vaccinated individuals may not only suffer long-term health consequences but could also become “super spreaders” of spike proteins, potentially endangering public health for generations. The idea that mRNA vaccines could rewrite human DNA and turn individuals into perpetual bioweapon vectors is a chilling prospect, one that aligns with the emerging field of transhumanism. As genetic updates become the norm, the line between human and machine blurs, raising ethical questions about autonomy, consent, and the future of humanity. Sources include: AlexBerensen.substack.com Medicine.Yale.edu NaturalNews.com To read the original article, click here

The post Yale Study Finds Spike Proteins from COVID Jabs Persist for TWO YEARS: Are mRNA Vaccines Rewriting Human DNA? appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Kansas Sues Pfizer for Misleading the Public About the Risks of its mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines

The AHA! Team — Wed, 02 Oct 2024 08:06:39 +0000

Cassie B. via Natural News – The state of Kansas has filed a consumer protection lawsuit against the pharmaceutical company Pfizer, accusing it of misleading the public when it comes to both the safety and efficacy of its highly controversial mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. According to the suit, Pfizer knew that its vaccine came with significant adverse effects and manipulated its safety trials in order to deceive the public, violating Kansas’s consumer protection laws as well as previous consent judgments. The suit cites a slew of supporting evidence, including scientific and government research, press releases, interviews, and news reports demonstrating Pfizer’s misdeeds. According to the suit, Pfizer knew that its vaccine came with significant adverse effects and manipulated its safety trials For example, they cited a paper from the New England Journal of Medicine and an FDA memo to support the allegation that Pfizer purposely destroyed the control group of a COVID vaccine trial by providing participants with access to the jab. This made it impossible to fairly evaluate the safety of the vaccine by comparing a vaccinated group to one that was not vaccinated, the lawsuit alleges. In addition, they cited two articles from the British Medical Journal indicating that Pfizer delayed the release of vaccine trial data intentionally and only tested healthy patients in its vaccine trials in a marked departure from what is considered protocol. They cited two articles from the British Medical Journal indicating that Pfizer delayed the release of vaccine trial data intentionally To support their allegation that the company purposefully misrepresented the vaccine’s safety, they included press releases from Pfizer and interviews with CEO Albert Bourla in which the vaccine is presented as safe and effective. The lawsuit also refers to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by the watchdog group Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency in America with the FDA, through which they obtained information about the vaccine. From this FOIA suit, the group acquired an internal Pfizer database listing adverse events that was never shared with the public and contained far more incidents than those listed in the public-facing Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. In total, the internal database showed nearly 160,000 adverse events, along with more than 1,200 fatalities among the millions of people who received the vaccine as of February 2021. Heart problems and pregnancy complications weren’t disclosed to public The lawsuit also focused on specific health issues that have been coming to light since the vaccine rollout, such as heart problems. Not long after the vaccine started being administered to young people, it became apparent that it was having an adverse effect on their hearts, particularly young men. Myocarditis, which occurs when the middle layer of the heart’s wall becomes inflamed, can weaken the organ and has the potential to cause heart failure. The lawsuit alleges: “Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public.” Another point of concern cited by the lawsuit is the dangers of the vaccine in pregnant women. It maintains that the company knew from a study that rat fetuses had trouble getting pregnant and implanting embryos and that their fetuses suffered malformations yet insisted to the public that the jab did not present any risk to pregnant women. The rat study was another revelation from the FOIA lawsuit, but the Kansas lawsuit also notes that Pfizer’s own data showed that tens of thousands of women experienced menstrual irregularities after getting the jab as of spring 2022. Kansas attorney general Kris Kobach told the National Review in an interview that the state’s Consumer Protection Act is designed to prevent consumers from being deceived by companies like Pfizer. “They had extraordinary success marketing their vaccine in the state of Kansas and more generally across the globe, and I think that had consumers had this information, many of them might have made a different choice,” he asserted. Sources for this article include: ArmageddonProse.Substack.com NationalReview.com To read the original article, click here: https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-09-20-kansas-sues-pfizer-misleading-public-risks-vaccines.html

The post Kansas Sues Pfizer for Misleading the Public About the Risks of its mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Innovative Genome Editing Treatment Destroys Cancer Cells

AHA Publisher — Tue, 08 Dec 2020 08:00:17 +0000

Abigail Klein Leichman via Israel21c – There’s been a lot of press about upcoming Covid-19 vaccines built with mRNA – genetic messengers that carry instructions to cells to make proteins to treat or prevent disease. This same technology was used to treat cancer in mice in the laboratory of Prof. Dan Peer, VP for R&D and head of the Laboratory of Precision Nanomedicine at the Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research at Tel Aviv University. The novel lipid nanoparticle-based delivery system, called CRISPR-LNPs, carries mRNA that encodes for the enzyme Cas9. This enzyme acts as a molecular pair of scissors that snips the cancer cells’ DNA, effectively destroying them. The results of the study, funded by Israel Cancer Research Fund, were published November 18 in the Science Advances journal. “This is the first study in the world to prove that the CRISPR genome editing system can be used to treat cancer in a living animal effectively,” said Peer. “It must be emphasized that this is not chemotherapy. There are no side effects, and a cancer cell treated in this way will never become active again. The molecular scissors of Cas9 cut the cancer cell’s DNA, thereby neutralizing it and permanently preventing replication.” Peer and his team chose to test the technology on two of the deadliest cancers: glioblastoma and metastatic ovarian cancer. Glioblastoma is the most aggressive type of brain cancer, with a five-year survival rate of only 3%. A single treatment with CRISPR-LNPs doubled the average life expectancy of mice with glioblastoma tumors, improving their overall survival rate by about 30%. Ovarian cancer is the most lethal cancer of the female reproductive system; only a third of the patients survive this disease. Treatment with CRISPR-LNPs in a metastatic ovarian cancer mice model increased their overall survival rate by 80%. “The CRISPR genome editing technology, capable of identifying and altering any genetic segment, has revolutionized our ability to disrupt, repair or even replace genes in a personalized manner,” said Peer. “Despite its extensive use in research, clinical implementation is still in its infancy because an effective delivery system is needed to safely and accurately deliver the CRISPR to its target cells. The delivery system we developed targets the DNA responsible for the cancer cells’ survival. This is an innovative treatment for aggressive cancers that have no effective treatments today.” He said the research team now intends “to go on to experiments with blood cancers that are very interesting genetically, as well as genetic diseases such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy. It will probably take some time before the new treatment can be used in humans, but we are optimistic.” The researchers include, among others, Daniel Rosenblum, Anna Gutkin and Dinorah Friedmann-Morvinski from TAU; Dr. Zvi Cohen, head of neurosurgical oncology at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Mark Behlke, CSO at Integrated DNA Technologies; and Prof. Judy Lieberman of Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School. “Through Ramot, the technology transfer company of Tel Aviv University, we are already negotiating with international corporations and foundations, aiming to bring the benefits of genetic editing to human patients,” said Peer. To read the original article click here. For more articles from Israel21c click here.

The post Innovative Genome Editing Treatment Destroys Cancer Cells appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.