cancer risk Archives - Amazing Health Advances

Hair Dye WARNING: Undeniable Link Between Hair Dye Chemicals & Cancer

The AHA! Team — Wed, 13 Aug 2025 05:04:18 +0000

Dena Schmidt via NaturalHealth365 – Surprisingly, 75 percent of people in the U.S., Japan, and Europe dye their hair regularly. Gray hair can make people look prematurely old, and hair color is used to preserve that more youthful appearance. Sometimes, people just want a change from their natural hair color, and dyeing it can help them make a ‘fashion statement.’ In truth, hair coloring is an ancient practice. However, in the past, people used natural substances such as henna and other pigments found in plants, soil, and clay. Today, most of the store-bought hair color options are made with harsh, toxic chemicals that can pose a serious health risk when used regularly over time. The dangers of hair color aren’t highly publicized Some of the risks and side effects of the chemicals found in hair dyes include cancers of the kidney, bladder, and breast, as well as blood-based cancers like leukemia and lymphoma. But don’t expect your local salon to post any warning signs soon – for obvious reasons. The “official word” on hair color products that contain harsh chemicals is far from cautionary. However, one of the common chemicals used, called P-phenylenediamine (PPD), is documented as causing side effects like asthma, gastritis, severe dermatitis, eye irritation, vertigo, tremors, convulsions, kidney failure, and coma in those who are exposed to it. Now, a new study adds to growing concerns by revealing that another synthetic hair dye pigment, 4-Chloro-orthophenylenediamine (4-Cl-OPD), can cause significant DNA damage when exposed to high nitric oxide levels. Researchers found that this damage leads to structural changes in DNA, triggering immune system reactions in those with prolonged hair dye use. The study even linked these immune responses to hepatocellular carcinoma, suggesting that chronic hair dye exposure could contribute to a pro-inflammatory, cancer-promoting environment. Some hair color products contain thousands of chemical compounds However, PPD and 4-Cl-OPD aren’t the only risks. Some hair color products contain as many as 5,000 chemicals, including lead acetate and ammonia. The chemicals in hair color products also interact with the substances in human hair to produce harmful effects. Hair colors come in temporary, semi-permanent, and permanent solutions. However, 80 percent of the market comprises permanent colors containing agents like couplers and intermediates that react with hydrogen peroxide. While the worst hair color product ingredients were banned in the 1970s, many products still contain dangerous substances. Research confirms the health hazards of hair color products Numerous studies have substantiated these hair color risks. A 1994 National Cancer Institute report covered the dangers of dark hair dyes used over extended periods. They were found to raise the risk of cancers like multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Another study by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) found that hairdressers who worked regularly with these products had an increased risk of bladder cancer, leukemia, and lymphoma. The scalp has a rich blood supply, making it easy for the toxic chemicals in hair dyes to soak into the skin. During the 30 minutes, hair dyes remain in contact with the scalp and can easily enter the blood supply. Fortunately, there is a better way. Avoid the cancer risk: Consider safer, non-toxic alternatives Fortunately, there are safer alternatives to these toxic products. Hairprint is a natural hair color brand developed by award-winning chemist John Warner. Instead of harsh chemicals, it contains non-toxic, plant-based, food-grade pigments and minerals. Best of all, Hairprint has a restorative effect on hair, enriching it and restoring the shine and luster that can be lost as hair ages. Hairprint products are also hypoallergenic and free of odor. Sources for this article include: NIH.gov Beatcancer.org NIH.gov Oxfordjournals.org To read the original article click here.

The post Hair Dye WARNING: Undeniable Link Between Hair Dye Chemicals & Cancer appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Bone Fractures, Lung Cancer, and Vitamin B12 Supplements?

The AHA! Team — Fri, 14 Feb 2025 06:21:08 +0000

Michael Greger M.D. FACLM via Nutrition Facts – What do randomized controlled trials of high-dose daily vitamin B12 supplementation show about its effects on cancer risk, death, and longevity? In 2019, “Association of High Intakes of Vitamins B6 and B12 from Food and Supplements with Risk of Hip Fracture Among Postmenopausal Women in the [Harvard] Nurses’ Health Study” was published. Note, though, that only the combined high intake of vitamins B6 (≥35 mg/day) and B12 (≥20 mcg/day) was associated with an increased hip fracture risk. We know that treatment with high doses of vitamin B6 may increase hip fracture risk on its own. After a decade or so, those who had been taking high-dose (40 mg) B6 supplements had about a 40 percent higher hip fracture risk, but not those taking B12, as you can see below and at 0:35 in my video Do Vitamin B12 Supplements Cause Bone Fractures and Lung Cancer?. That’s what the Harvard study found, too. High intake of vitamin B12 alone was not associated with increased risk. In fact, some observational studies suggest a slightly lower fracture risk at high B12 blood levels. What we care about most, though, are interventional studies, where people are randomized to B12 so we can see what happens, and when we look at those, we find there is no increased fracture risk among those given B12. In conclusion, based on randomized controlled trials, high doses of vitamin B12 have not been shown to be associated with the risk of fractures. Okay, but what about this? In 2017, a study found that men taking vitamin B12 supplements appeared to have increased lung cancer risk. Now, the researchers didn’t find any such association in women, and the increased risk was mostly among men who smoked. Could it be that B12 was feeding budding tumors? It’s hard enough imagining a vitamin being carcinogenic on its own, especially if it somehow only affects men and not also women. “Replication of these ﬁndings in additional prospective studies with careful measurement of B vitamin supplement use is warranted.” And, indeed, when you put together all the observational studies, there is no signiﬁcant correlation between lung cancer and levels of B12 in the blood, whether you’ve smoked or not. If anything, most studies seemed to trend towards higher B12 levels being protective, as you can see below and at 2:03 in my video. Then, in 2018, a new study found an association between overall lung cancer risk and higher circulating levels of B12, again appearing to be more of a concern with smokers, as seen here and at 2:16 in my video. Now, this was another observational study. Those with higher B12 levels were just observed to have higher cancer levels. Those of you who have been following my work know the drill: There are two potential issues that arise in observational studies that prevent us from ascribing cause-and-effect: confounding factors, also known as “lurker variables,” and reverse causation. What might be a lurker variable in this case? What might be a third factor associated with both higher B12 levels and cancer that may be the true cause? Well, who has higher levels of B12 circulating in their blood? Those who eat a lot of meat and dairy, which are, in fact, “the most important contributors to serum vitamin B-12,” that is, B12 in our blood. And those who eat more meat do tend to have more lung cancer: “Dose-response analysis showed that consumption of red meat for 120 g per day might increase the risk of lung cancer by 35%, and consumption of processed meat for 50 g per day might increase the risk of lung cancer by 20%.” So, we’re generally talking about 35 percent more risk for every quarter-pound burger eaten each day and about 20 percent increased risk for every breakfast sausage link. It’s no wonder those with higher B12 levels in their blood could have more lung cancer. The B12 could just be a marker for meat intake. And, if you remember, reverse causation is when X may not lead to Y, but, instead, Y may lead to X. So, instead of high B12 blood levels leading to cancer, maybe cancer leads to high blood levels of B12. And, indeed, nearly 75 percent of patients diagnosed with cancer exhibit elevated B12 levels. So, elevated B12 levels may simply be a marker for cancer. Besides taking extra B12, there are all sorts of reasons your levels can rise, such as liver problems, kidney problems, bone marrow problems, and cancer, as you can see below and at 3:50 in my video. So, high B12 levels may just be a marker of brewing, but not yet diagnosed, cancer. What about observational studies specifically linking B12 supplement use to lung cancer, though? Those could also be reverse causation: “The consequence of being at risk for cancer is that patients will engage in healthier behaviors, including taking multivitamins (reverse causality). The well-established causes, such as smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and previous cancers, are the real lung cancer risks.” So, we’re left with this “chicken or the egg causality dilemma,” which is why, ideally, we need randomized controlled trials to see if there’s any cause and effect. This became even more urgent with genetic evidence suggesting that those born with higher lifelong levels may be at increased risk. Thankfully, as you can see below and at 4:47 in my video, we do have randomized controlled trials—more than a dozen randomized controlled trials randomizing thousands of people up to 2,000 micrograms of B12 every single day for years, in fact. The findings? “Vitamin B supplementation does not have an effect on cancer incidence, death due to cancer, or total mortality.” And this includes specifically looking at lung cancer, as seen below and at 5:02 in my video. In fact, if anything, vitamin B supplements may actually lower the risk of the most dangerous form of skin cancer. If you missed my previous video, check out Do Vitamin B12 Supplements Cause Acne?. For my other B12 updates, see related posts below. All of these videos can be found in one digital download: Latest Vitamin B12 Recommendations. I’ve also explored vitamin B12’s role in stroke risk. See the related posts below. That series is available for digital download, too: Why Do Vegetarians Have Higher Stroke Risk?. Key Takeaways High intakes of vitamins B6 and B12 together are associated with an increased risk of hip fractures in postmenopausal women, but high B12 alone does not increase this risk. High doses of vitamin B12, based on randomized controlled trials, have not been shown to increase the risk of fractures, unlike high doses of vitamin B6. Some studies suggest that B12 supplementation may be linked to an increased risk of lung cancer in men, particularly smokers, though this association has not been consistently observed. Higher B12 levels in observational studies might be linked to higher meat consumption, which could be the true cause of increased cancer risk, rather than B12 itself. Elevated B12 levels may indicate underlying health issues like cancer, rather than being a direct cause of cancer, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between correlation and causation. To read the original article click here.

The post Bone Fractures, Lung Cancer, and Vitamin B12 Supplements? appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Scientists Warn: Men’s Cancer Deaths Predicted to Soar by 93% by 2050

The AHA! Team — Wed, 29 Jan 2025 06:53:51 +0000

News Staff via NaturalHealth365 – Cancer is a diagnosis nobody wants to receive – it’s terrifying. While cancer rates have steadily climbed for most types, deaths from cancer have gone down. That’s good news, but it’s not the whole story. Few epidemiological studies have examined cancer cases versus deaths from the disease, so researchers have decided to investigate this gap. They focused on men’s cancer rates versus mortality, mainly because men’s cancer risk factors tend to be more controllable than women’s or children’s. What they found is concerning, but there is hope. We’ll look at their results and methods, what we can expect for men’s cancer rates going forward, and what you can do to lower your risks. Men’s cancer rates: A growing but preventable crisis The study we’re looking at was conducted in 2022 when cancer incidence was about 212 per 100,000 men surveyed. While this might not sound like a huge number, it is significant – and the research suggests these numbers could jump by up to 93% by 2050. Generally speaking, women face certain cancer risks due to their biology. The hormonal changes they experience throughout life make them more susceptible to cancers men simply don’t have to worry about – either because men lack ovaries and a uterus or because they don’t go through the same hormonal shifts. Men, however, have a different problem: they tend to make riskier lifestyle choices and pay less attention to their health than women, driving up their cancer rates for largely preventable reasons. While men don’t face the risks of breast, uterine, ovarian, or other female reproductive cancers, they tend to smoke more, drink more, and make poorer lifestyle choices than women, including bad diet and lack of exercise. These factors account for a huge portion of cancer rates – and they’re largely preventable. Are men’s cancer rates rising faster than we can handle? The researchers analyzed global epidemiological data to develop what they call an MIR (mortality to incidence ratio). They hypothesized that men in societies with lower Human Development Index (HDI) scores would have a much closer MIR to men in higher HDI countries. This makes sense – poor access to medical care, low socioeconomic status, war, disease, famine, and social unrest create low HDI societies. At the same time, countries like Australia, the U.S., and most of Europe rank higher on the HDI scale. They collected statistical data on males across several age groups: 15 to 64, 15 to 39, 40 to 64, and 65 and older. By sampling these diverse age groups and breaking them down by HDI status, they could better understand mortality versus incidence rates. The researchers then used this data to project men’s cancer rates 25 years into the future, assuming current societal conditions remained unchanged. The results were troubling. In low and medium HDI countries, the MIR was significantly closer – meaning cancer rates and deaths from cancer were nearly matched. Higher HDI countries showed high cancer incidence but lower mortality rates. This difference partly stems from richer countries having more access to cancer-promoting lifestyles, but researchers also noted better diagnostic capabilities in countries with stronger healthcare systems. One of the study’s most striking findings focused on men over 65, who showed the highest mortality rates when diagnosed with almost any type of cancer, especially rare ones like pancreatic or unusual blood cancers. The researchers suggested this might be because older men are less likely to seek treatment, have lower treatment tolerance, or lack access to necessary care due to economic factors. What the study says about men’s cancer rates The study projects a nearly 93% increase in men’s cancer rates by 2050 if current trends and variables remain unchanged. It emphasizes the critical role of wealthier nations in supporting poorer countries to strengthen global cancer diagnosis and treatment. The researchers advocate for creating a robust network of interconnected medical data sharing to improve outcomes worldwide. How to lower your cancer risk: Simple steps every man can take As research shows, men’s cancer risks often stem from preventable factors we impose on ourselves. Men are more likely to use tobacco and alcohol, engage in risky behaviors, maintain poor diets, live sedentary lifestyles, and work jobs with carcinogen exposure. We’re also less likely than women to see doctors and often ignore cancer symptoms for months – choices that can seriously impact treatment success. Nature offers many tools to fight disease, though we often overlook these natural protections. Quit smoking – period. There’s no benefit to smoking, only downsides. Lung cancer has the highest incidence and mortality rate for men worldwide, with smoking as a leading cause. Monitor alcohol intake. While moderate drinking might be okay, most men drink more than safe amounts. Excessive drinking doesn’t just harm your liver and heart – it increases cancer risk across the board. Your diet matters enormously in cancer prevention. Add cancer-fighting foods like organic walnuts, black beans, turmeric, chilies, and ginger. Increase your fruit and vegetable intake while removing processed foods. These changes particularly help prevent colon cancer. Exercise regularly – it helps trigger death in damaged cells. Consider beneficial supplements like ashwagandha, curcumin, vitamin D, and green tea. These have shown promising results in cancer prevention. Manage stress through regular exercise and meditation. High stress causes inflammation, which can promote cancer development. Make stress management a priority in your daily routine. Cancer rates are rising, but you can take action now to lower your risk. Many of these changes aren’t about adding new habits but stopping harmful ones. Taking charge of your health brings multiple benefits: lower blood pressure, reduced cardiovascular disease risk, less inflammation, and better overall well-being. Don’t make it easier for disease to take hold – start protecting your health today. Editor’s note: Discover the best ways to naturally avoid the threat of cancer from many of the best holistic cancer experts, own the Stop Cancer Docu-Class created by NaturalHealth365 Programs. Sources for this article include: Wiley.com To read the original article click here.

The post Scientists Warn: Men’s Cancer Deaths Predicted to Soar by 93% by 2050 appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Cancer Alert: Insidious Chemical Linked to Increased Prostate Cancer Risk

The AHA! Team — Wed, 27 Nov 2024 06:11:33 +0000

Patrick Tims via NaturalHealth365 – Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. More than 299,000 new cases of prostate cancer will be diagnosed in 2024 alone. A new study published in Nutrients reveals environmental endocrine disruptors, including BPA (Bisphenol A) chemicals, are tied to a heightened risk of prostate cancer. Elevated BPA levels have a causal relationship with a higher incidence of prostate cancer The study found that higher exposure to BPA chemicals in men was associated with an increased risk of developing prostate cancer. Researchers utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) collected between 2003 and 2012 and analyzed several factors, including BPA levels, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration, medical history, and sociodemographic information. Sociodemographic data considered in the study included: Body mass index (BMI) Poverty income ratio (PIR) Race and ethnicity Smoking status Cholesterol levels Statistical analysis revealed a positive correlation between BPA exposure and prostate cancer risk. This is likely due to BPA’s interaction with estrogen receptor-α, a hormone expressed in the prostate gland, which may play a role in the development of prostate cancer. Defining prostate cancer risk through quantification According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a PSA level of 4 ng/mL is considered a threshold for prostate cancer risk. Levels below 4 ng/mL are associated with low cancer risk, while readings above 4 ng/mL indicate a higher risk. From the nearly 54,000 participants in NHANES, 2,738 men met the study’s inclusion criteria. The analysis identified a correlation between PSA and BPA levels, showing that for each unit increase in BPA concentration, there was a 2.760 ng/mL rise in PSA. Further data showed that men classified as high-risk for prostate cancer had a 42.5% to 72% increased likelihood of developing the disease with each additional unit of BPA concentration. A single unit increase in urinary BPA levels corresponded to a 2.760 ng/mL spike in PSA, reinforcing the connection between BPA exposure and elevated PSA levels, which may lead to the development of prostate cancer. Additional analysis of a subgroup revealed that individuals aged 75 and older had an even higher risk. Those with hypertension also showed an increased risk of prostate cancer, which escalated alongside rising BPA concentrations. The positive association between BPA and PSA levels has a key cutoff point Research has identified a significant inflection point in the relationship between BPA concentration and PSA levels at 4.46 ng/mL. The positive correlation between BPA exposure and PSA levels is notably stronger at this specific threshold, particularly in older American males. This cutoff point marks a critical value where the risk of elevated PSA, and potentially prostate cancer, becomes more pronounced with increasing BPA levels. This finding is important because previous studies may have overlooked such specific benchmarks. Medical professionals will likely adopt the 4.46 ng/mL cutoff as a valuable reference for prostate cancer screenings. This could improve early detection, especially as BPA exposure becomes a recognized factor in prostate cancer risk. Solutions to reduce your BPA exposure BPA (Bisphenol A) is widely present in many everyday products, making it impossible to avoid them completely. However, there are effective ways to significantly reduce your exposure to this harmful chemical, particularly for men concerned about the link between BPA and prostate health. 1. Minimize plastic use Reduce or eliminate your use of plastic products, especially those that come into contact with food. BPA is commonly found in plastic containers, water bottles, and packaging materials. Opt for BPA-free or non-plastic alternatives such as glass, stainless steel, or ceramic. 2. Transfer food to non-plastic containers After shopping, transfer foods from plastic or canned packaging into non-plastic containers. Cans often have BPA in their lining, so moving food to safer storage options, like glass containers, reduces potential BPA leaching. 3. Avoid heating food in plastic Never microwave or heat up a food in plastic containers, as heat can cause BPA to leach into the food. Instead, use alternative containers like glass or ceramic. Plus, as a ‘side note,’ don’t use a microwave – which damages the quality of your food. 4. Limit canned foods BPA is often used in the lining of canned foods, so try to reduce the consumption of canned goods. Choose fresh or frozen foods whenever possible, and look for brands with BPA-free packaging. 5. Use BPA-free water bottles and tableware Replace plastic water bottles with BPA-free versions, or use stainless steel or glass bottles. Similarly, switch to BPA-free plates and utensils to further limit exposure. 6. Say no to sales receipts Many thermal paper receipts contain BPA, which can be absorbed through the skin. If possible, decline printed receipts or use digital receipts as an alternative. 7. Be mindful of other sources BPA is also found in protective eyewear, dental sealants, and personal care products. Be conscious of the materials you come into contact with and seek BPA-free alternatives where applicable. By following these steps, you can significantly reduce your exposure to BPA and minimize the health risks associated with these endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Sources for this article include: MDPI.com News-medical.net Zerocancer.org To read the original article click here.

The post Cancer Alert: Insidious Chemical Linked to Increased Prostate Cancer Risk appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Antioxidants in Grapes Found to Reduce Cancer Risk

The AHA! Team — Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:07:00 +0000

Olivia Cook via Natural News – Recent studies have found that the antioxidants found in grapes may have anticancer properties. As the global quest for natural cancer-fighting solutions continues, there is increasing concern about the rising incidence of cancer among adolescents and young adults. Despite advancements in treatment, these methods are often costly, invasive and associated with significant adverse side effects. Fruits play a vital role in a healthy, plant-based diet. They combat inflammation and chronic conditions that lead to cancer. The shift in focus toward prevention is seen as a promising alternative. Antioxidants prevent damage to cells by neutralizing harmful molecules called free radicals. Without antioxidants, free radicals can cause DNA damage which could lead to cancer. (Related: Sermon 49: Mike Adams discusses GRAPES as God’s amazing natural medicine and nutrient powerhouse.) Grapes are rich in various antioxidants – particularly phenolic compounds – which are known for their potential health benefits. Key antioxidants in grapes include anthocyanins, catechins, phenolic acids, procyanidins and resveratrol. Fresh grapes contain between 63 and 182 milligrams of these phenolic compounds per 100 grams. Most of these antioxidants are concentrated in grape skins and seeds. Anthocyanins are the predominant flavonoids in red grapes. Meanwhile, grape seed extracts have shown high concentrations of flavonoids like catechin and epicatechin, as well as phenolic acids like caffeic and gallic acids. Resveratrol, another prominent antioxidant, is mainly found in grape skins but in lower concentrations. Grape phenolic compounds and their anticancer properties Grape antioxidants, especially those found in grape seeds, have shown promising effects in fighting various types of cancer. These compounds are known as grape seed proanthocyanidins. These have been effective in laboratory studies for inhibiting the growth of cancer cells in the following ways: Breast cancer. A special grape seed extract rich in procyanidins interferes with the breast cancer cell’s key growth signaling pathways – leading to a halt in cell division and growth. Colon cancer. Grape seed extracts and other grape components stop cell growth and induce cell death (apoptosis). The combination of resveratrol, with grape seed extracts enhances these effects by affecting key proteins involved in cell death and growth. Head and neck cancer. Grape seed extract causes cell cycle arrest, which means stopping cells from dividing, thus inducing cell death. This is achieved through activating processes that check for DNA damage and increasing harmful reactive oxygen species inside cells, which leads to cell death. Grape seed extract also affects key proteins that help the cancer cells move and invade other tissues. Lung cancer. In non-small-cell lung cancer, which is a common type of lung cancer, grape seed proanthocyanidins can increase proteins that promote cell death and decrease proteins that protect cancer cells. They also disrupt the mitochondria and activate certain enzymes involved in cell death. Oral cancer. Grape seed extract halts oral cancer growth and induces cell death in a dose-dependent manner, which means more grape seed extracts lead to greater effects. It also reduces the cancer cells’ ability to suppress enzymes that allow cancer cells to migrate and invade other tissues. Prostate cancer. Grape seed extract can block certain enzymes that help cancer cells grow and invade healthy tissues. It also reduces the activity of proteins that promote cancer spread. Skin cancer. In melanoma, a serious skin cancer, grape seed proanthocyanidins can reduce the ability of cancer cells to invade and migrate. This effect is linked to a decrease in specific proteins that contribute to cancer cell movement. These study findings suggest that grape seed antioxidants could be a valuable addition to cancer prevention and treatment strategies – offering natural options to support health and combat various cancers. Watch this video about the benefits of grape seed extract. This video is from the Holistic Herbalist channel on Brighteon.com. More related stories: Sermon 12: Mike Adams discusses the use of APRICOT KERNELS as an ANTICANCER treatment. Lycopene: Harnessing natural carotenoids for cancer prevention. The mighty BLUEBERRY, a superfruit with anticancer properties. Sources include: OnlineLibrary.Wiley.com Cancer.OSY.edu JAMANetwork.com Brighteon.com To read the original article, click here: https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-10-01-antioxidants-in-grapes-help-reduce-cancer-risk.html

The post Antioxidants in Grapes Found to Reduce Cancer Risk appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Junk Food Warning: Eating Processed Food Does ‘Crazy’ Things to Your Cancer Risk

The AHA! Team — Mon, 11 Nov 2024 06:08:06 +0000

Sharon Thomas via NaturalHealth365 – NEW research: Every 10% increase in calories from junk food triggers a ‘CRAZY’ effect on cancer risk Most people “get it” that eating candy and highly processed food is bad for us. But while most people try to avoid junk food because it will make them fat, many still fail to realize the most serious problem with eating these “treats.” In a nutshell (no pun intended), the alarming results of a recent study clearly link junk food eating habits with a substantial increase in cancer risk. NEW research: Every 10% increase in calories from junk food triggers a ‘CRAZY’ effect on cancer risk And, just to be clear, it’s ‘crazy’ because once you realize that a bad habit (substantially) increases the risk of cancer and you continue to do it … that’s crazy. According to most holistic physicians, 95% of all cancer diagnoses are related to environment and lifestyle. Even the American Institute for Cancer Research’s more conservative estimate of one-third is still startling. What’s the major takeaway from this statement? A cancer diagnosis is avoidable with proper lifestyle changes. And of all the lifestyle changes you could make, avoiding processed food is one of the most important. Consider data from a French prospective cohort study called NutriNet-Santé, which spanned eight years and involved 104,980 subjects. By analyzing daily meal logs, researchers were able to determine an important correlation: If just 10% of a person’s total daily calories came from “ultra-processed” foods, then they had a 12% INCREASED risk for overall cancer. Subsequent 10% increments in junk food calories increased their cancer risk by the same degree! The researchers suggest several possible reasons why. First, junk food has more refined sugar, less fiber, and fewer vitamins and minerals than whole and minimally processed foods, which can disrupt the healthy gut microbiota and promote inflammation. Second, chemicals, preservatives, fillers, and other ingredients (as well as their processing, e.g., the application of pesticides) are carcinogenic in their own right. The research is clear: repeatedly eating these foods can lead to serious health complications over time – not the least of which is packing on the pounds. Best junk food advice: Avoid the heavily processed foods that can make you sick It’s not just candy and cakes which increase your cancer risk. Here’s an extensive list of the foods which the researchers considered “ultra-processed:” “[M]ass produced packaged breads and buns; sweet or savory packaged snacks; industrialized confectionery and desserts; sodas and sweetened drinks; meat balls, poultry and fish nuggets, and other reconstituted meat products transformed with addition of preservatives other than salt (for example, nitrites); instant noodles and soups; frozen or shelf stable ready meals; and other food products made mostly or entirely from sugar, oils and fats, and other substances not commonly used in culinary preparations such as hydrogenated oils, modified starches, and protein isolates. Industrial processes notably include hydrogenation, hydrolysis, extruding, moulding, reshaping, and pre-processing by frying. Flavoring agents, colors, emulsifiers, humectants, non-sugar sweeteners, and other cosmetic additives are often added to these products to imitate sensorial properties of unprocessed or minimally processed foods and their culinary preparations or to disguise undesirable qualities of the final product.” Want a few simple hacks to help you make smarter choices at the grocery store? Keep these tips in mind: Opt for organic, whole, real food in its natural state whenever possible. These are usually found along the perimeters of the grocery store. If it has a super long shelf life and/or is found in the middle aisles of the grocery store, be suspicious. If it contains ingredients you can’t read, be suspicious. As the journalist Michael Pollan suggests, avoid “food-like substances.” Lastly, realize that food that has been heavily manufactured, tinkered with, and ultra-processed is virtually addictive by design. Keep this in mind: the largest food producers in the world want you to crave sugary foods because they’re cheap, accessible, and something you’ll want to buy again and again! Fortunately, you and your family can train yourself to break the cycle: skip the processed garbage, learn how to cook simple (healthy) meals, and eat as close to nature (organic) as possible. Even if you change just one meal at a time, start somewhere. Editor’s note: I know most of our NaturalHealth365 readers already appreciate much of what this article says. Yet, the main point is to provide a ‘tool’ for you to share with someone else who needs to read this message. Keep in mind: it’s NOT about ‘convincing’ anyone to do anything. But, I do believe it’s our responsibility to share valuable information with others and let them decide. Sources for this article include: NIH.gov NaturalMedicineJournal.com NIH.gov To read the original article click here.

The post Junk Food Warning: Eating Processed Food Does ‘Crazy’ Things to Your Cancer Risk appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Ultra-Processed Foods Linked to Cancer, Early Death, Cognitive Decline

AHA Publisher — Wed, 14 Dec 2022 08:00:11 +0000

Dr. Josh Axe, DC, DNM, CN – When you hear “ultra-processed foods,” you probably pictures things like soda, cereal, cookies and frozen dinners — and you’d be right. According to a study published in the medical journal BMJ Open, these are considered ultra-processed foods, or “formulations of several ingredients which, besides salt, sugar, oils and fats, include food substances not used in culinary preparations.” A large body of research suggests that there are many dangerous effects of eating large amounts of ultra-processed foods, and there’s no doubt about it, the amount that many Americans eat is alarming. A 2021 JAMA study, for example, found that ultra-processed foods now account for two-thirds (67 percent) of calories on average in the diets of American children and teens. The BMJ study mentioned above uncovered that 58 percent of the average American’s daily energy intake comes from unhealthy foods like cakes, white breads and diet sodas. That’s not all. Research published in 2022 shows ultra-processed foods are linked withcancer and early death — and could even raise the risk of cognitive decline. What types of health problems may this lead to? As explained more below, consumption of such unhealthy ingredients is linked to problems including: obesity diabetes heart disease inflammatory bowel disease depression even cancer What Are Ultra-Processed Foods? Processed foods are those that have been changed in any way from their natural states, whether due to washing, canning, freezing or adding ingredients to them. Ultra–processed foods take things a step further: They are made mostly from substances extracted from foods, such as fats, starches, added sugars and hydrogenated fats, according to Harvard Health Publishing. Processed foods are definitely a tricky subject. Considering that many seemingly healthy foods come in packages today, it can be hard to tell the difference between “whole foods” and those that are processed. For example, is oatmeal an ultra-processed food? Are things like bagged trail mix or bottled fruit smoothies actually healthy choices? Breads and oatmeal are in fact “processed” even if they are healthy and homemade. You don’t just nibble on these grains — you process them into a loaf or rolled oats. Nut butters are processed, too, when they’re churned into a creamy spread. In fact, any food that hasn’t been directly pulled out of the ground and eaten is technically processed, like frozen fruits or canned veggies. The Processed Foods Spectrum: Not all processed foods are created equally, however. Chowing down on Twinkies is certainly not the same as adding frozen spinach to your smoothies, even though they’re technically both processed. What is the difference between processed and ultra-processed food? Check out the spectrum below: Avoid: Ultra-processed foods — This group includes things like frozen dinners (yes, that includes pizza), all sodas (even diet!), store-bought cakes and cookies (goodbye, Little Debbie), boxed cake mixes, etc. These are made with added fats, starches, added sugars, hydrogenated fat and other artificial ingredients. Not often: Processed foods — This includes ingredients like jarred pasta sauce, sausages, store-bought salad dressings and whole-grain bread. These aren’t terrible in moderation or when you’re short on time, but when possible, it’s best to make your own versions to limit added ingredients. When you do purchase these, look for those that have a limited amount (two to four) ingredients. Better: Minimally processed foods — This includes things like extra virgin olive oil, meats (naturally raised), plain yogurt, nut butters (where the only ingredients are the nut and salt), frozen vegetables and fruit that have been processed at their peak to lock in freshness and nutrition. Ideally these should be just one to two ingredients. Best: Unprocessed foods — Fresh fruit, wild-caught fish and veggies fall into this category. They’re delicious just as nature made them. Effects on Health What do ultra-processed foods do to your body? Research shows that diets high in processed foods are associated with: Weight gain and obesity, including among children and teens Heart disease and vascular diseases Diabetes Depression Cancer More A 2019 study published in the journal Cell Metabolism that compared the effects of an ultra-processed diet to those of an unprocessed diet found that people consumed about 500 more calories per day on the ultra-processed diet. The ultra-processed diet usually resulted in higher intake of carbohydrates and fat but not protein. Participants gained on average two pounds during the ultra-processed diet phase of the study, which lasted just 14 days. Another study found that over a five-year period, people who consumed more ultra-processed foods had higher risks of cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease. This remained true even after the researchers adjusted for the nutritional quality of the diet (considering factors such as the amount saturated fat, sodium, sugar and dietary fiber in the diets). A 2018 study linked high consumption of these types of foods to a greater risk of developing certain types of cancer. Researchers found that a 10 percent increase in ultra-processed foods in someone’s diet was correlated to about an 11 percent increase in developing breast cancer. A 2022 study backed up this data, finding a correlation between ultra-processed food consumption and colorectal cancer. Researchers concluded, “In the three large prospective cohorts, high consumption of total ultra-processed foods in men and certain subgroups of ultra-processed foods in men and women was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer.” Then there is the effect on cognition, as noted by research published in JAMA Neurol: In a cohort study of 10,775 individuals, higher consumption of ultra-processed foods was associated with a higher rate of global and executive function decline after a median follow-up of 8 years. … These findings suggest that limiting consumption of ultra-processed food could be associated with reduced cognitive decline in middle-aged and older adults. Added sugar found in many packaged foods is also a big health concern. Today it’s estimated that about 90 percent of Americans’ “added sugar intake” comes from ultra-processed foods. In fact, sugar makes up about 21 percent of the calories found in ultra-processed foods. High consumption of sugar, as well as different types of artificial sweeteners, is associated with a variety of health conditions, from obesity to type 2 diabetes to migraines. Studies have shown that people who consume more than 21 percent of their daily calories from added sugar double their risk of death from heart disease compared to those who consume less than 10 percent of their calories from added sugars. It’s not an exaggeration to say that added sugars are killing us. Ultra-Processed Foods List What is considered ultra-processed food? These are the types of food products that are loaded with preservatives, additives and unrecognizable ingredients. Many are also artificially colored and flavored, often deep-fried, and contain next to no nutritional value. Many things offered at “fast food” restaurants fall into this category. Fast food is fast and cheap for a reason … the large majority of the time, it’s processed and pre-prepared. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics, about 37 percent of American adults eat fast food on a given day. Data also showed eating fast food decreased with age, surprisingly increased with income, and was more popular among men and non-Hispanic Black adults. Some examples of ultra-processed foods to avoid include: Chips, many crackers and salty snacks, and French fries Frozen pizza and other frozen meals Many cheeses and processed meats, like hot dogs, bologna, etc. Cakes, cookies, brownies, donuts and frostings Candy Fast food Soda, many juices and energy drinks How to Eat Less Ultra-Processed Foods (Healthy Swaps) 1. Make Gradual Changes While it’s tempting to make drastic dietary changes, you and your family have a better chance of sticking to healthy habits if you decide on one change at a time. For example, if you usually serve soda or juice with meals, try replacing these with water instead. After a few days, remove another major source of sugar. Not only will this help ease you into changes mentally, but it’ll also help reduce any physical symptoms you might experience. 2. Shop with a Grocery List It’s a lot easier to make healthy choices and avoid ultra-processed foods when you have a list of the items you’re looking to add into your diet instead. Make a list of the meals you’re preparing for the week and all the ingredients required. If you’re thinking of heading to the store without eating, forget about it. Shopping on an empty stomach will make it harder to resist those foods you should avoid. 3. Shop the Store’s Perimeter You’ve probably heard it before, but there’s a reason it’s recommended that you shop the edge of the store and skip most of the middle aisles. Fresh produce, meats and dairy are nearly always around the store perimeter, while ultra-processed foods get stacked on the shelves in the middle of the store. By limiting the aisles you shop, you’ll resist temptation to purchase bad-for-you foods. Similarly, hit the healthier part of the grocery store first. One of the things I love about certain Whole Foods is that you enter the store in the vegetable and fruit area, so you start loading up on the best foods in the store well before you may start getting tempted by the naughty processed or ultra-processed foods. 4. Read the Ingredients List If there’s something on the ingredients list of a packaged food that you couldn’t buy to use in your own kitchen – or whose name you can’t even pronounce – it’s probably highly processed. Don’t forget that ingredients are listed in the order of how prevalent in a food they are. Beware of what’s listed as one of the first five ingredients, or better yet, avoid foods that have more than five ingredients in them. 5. Look Out for Added Sugars Food manufacturers have gotten cleverer about how sugars are listed by using different terms for the substance in the ingredients list. One rule of thumb is that ingredients ending with “ose” are sugars: Think sucrose, fructose and dextrose. Another is to use fancy or “natural” sounding sugars, such as: cane sugar beet sugar cane juice fruit juice 6. Try These Healthier Alternatives Instead of chips and fries— Make your own. You don’t have to stick to potatoes either. I’m a huge fan of spicy kale chips, zucchini chips and even sweet baked apple chips. Keep these on hand when you need a TV time snack or to nibble on while getting dinner ready. Instead of frozen pizzas — Try one of these easy homemade doughs, like this coconut crust pizza or cauliflower pizza crust with your favorite toppings, such as veggies. These are super tasty, come together quickly and you can customize them to your family’s tastes. In place of sugary drinks — Replace sugary sodas and store-bought juices with homemade drinks that taste great and are good for you, too. This anti-inflammatory green juice will boost your body’s natural defenses, while my orange carrot ginger juiceis a crowd-pleaser among kids. In place of cakes, cookies, muffins — Sweet treats don’t need to be eliminated entirely, but when there are alternatives that taste this good, there’s no need for ultra-processed versions. This chocolate frosting is fantastic atop homemade baked goods, maybe even on this gluten-free chocolate cake. Alternatives to fast food — You can steer clear of fast food by meal prepping and choosing healthier restaurant options. (Here are the restaurants I recommend.) Fast food’s ubiquity can be difficult to escape, but it can be done. Eliminating those foods and replacing them with healthier alternatives is one of the best things you can do for your family’s health. Conclusion What are ultra-processed foods? These are foods that are made with added ingredients, such as sugar, salt, fat, and artificial colors or preservatives. Examples include fast food, chips, frozen meals, soda, processed meats and cheeses, and desserts like cake and cookies. It’s been found that about 58 percent of the average American’s daily energy intake comes from unhealthy foods like cakes, white breads and diet sodas, while they make up up to two-thirds...

The post Ultra-Processed Foods Linked to Cancer, Early Death, Cognitive Decline appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

How to Eat to Reduce Cancer Risk

AHA Publisher — Fri, 11 Nov 2022 08:00:30 +0000

Michael Greger M.D. FACLM via Nutrition Facts – What does the best available balance of evidence say right now about what to eat and what to avoid to reduce your risk of cancer? In 1982, a landmark report on diet, nutrition, and cancer was released by the National Academy of Sciences. It was “the first major, institutional, science-based report on this topic.” The report started out saying that “scientists must be especially careful in their choice of words whenever they are not totally confident about their conclusions.” For example, by that time, it had become “absolutely clear” that cigarettes were killing people. “If the population been persuaded to stop smoking when the association with lung cancer was first reported, these cancer deaths would not be occurring.” If you wait for absolute certainty, millions of people could die in the meantime, which is why, sometimes, you have to invoke the precautionary principle. For example, “emphasizing fruits and vegetables to reduce the risk of several common forms of cancer.” We’re not completely sure, but there’s good evidence—and what’s the downside? “There are no disadvantages for healthy people eating more fruits and vegetables,” as I discuss in my video The Best Advice on Diet and Cancer. The 1982 National Academy of Sciences report continued: “The public is now asking about the causes of cancers that are not associated with smoking. What are these causes, and how can these cancers be avoided? Unfortunately, it is not yet possible to make firm scientific pronouncements about the association between diet and cancer. We are in an interim stage of knowledge similar to that for cigarettes 20 years ago. Therefore, in the judgment of the committee, it is now the time to offer some interim guidelines on diet and cancer.” The committee raised concern about processed meats, for example, and, 30 years later, that concern was confirmed. Processed meat was officially declared “carcinogenic to humans.” Maybe if we had listened back in the early 1980s when the red flag first started waving, then we would have been spared Lunchables, about which a CEO of Philip Morris said: “One article said something like, ‘If you take Lunchables apart, the most healthy item in it is the napkin.’” The findings of this landmark 1982 diet and cancer report “generated a striking level of disbelief from the cancer community and outright hostility from people whose livelihood depended on foods in question and the food industry whose products were being questioned.” In fact, one of the authors of the report was “accused of ‘killing more people than those being saved,’” and there were formally organized petitions to expel the researchers from their professional societies. Indeed, “clearly a very sensitive nerve was touched.” The American Meat Science Association and other members of the Council for Agricultural Science and Technology criticized the report and released “Diet, Nutrition, and Cancer: A Critique” in 1982. They agreed that perhaps lives would be saved, but argued that the recommended “reductions in meat consumption would sharply reduce incomes to the livestock and meat processing industries….The fruit and vegetable industries would clearly benefit from the expanded demand for their products if consumers were to implement the guidelines. However, fruits and vegetables account for less than 15 percent of cash receipts for U.S. agriculture.” Most of the money is in “cattle, hogs, poultry products, feed grains, and oil crops.” This reminds me of the tobacco industry memo where Philip Morris spoke of the tobacco industry going bankrupt. Maybe it’s not the meat that’s causing cancer, the industry critique continued, but all the marijuana people are smoking these days. “How then can one argue that such an abundant diet causes cancer? Or is this only some jealous attack on the goodness of our diet, like that of the Reverend Jonathan Edwards in Puritan times who condemned bear baiting, not because of the pain for the bear but because of the pleasure of the spectators.” You can’t tell us to cut down on meat, they argued, “one of mankind’s few remaining pleasures is that of the table.” The day the National Academy of Sciences’ landmark report was published was “The Day That Food Was Declared a Poison” according to Thomas Jukes, the guy who discovered you could speed up the growth of chickens by feeding them antibiotics. How dare the National Academy of Sciences recommend people eat fruits, vegetables, and whole grains daily, which were said to contain “as yet unidentified compounds that may protect us against certain cancers. How can one select foods that contain unidentified compounds?…This is not a scientific recommendation; it sounds like ‘health food store’ literature.” My favorite critique, though, told us to think about the human breast. How can animal fat be bad for us if breast-feeding women create so much of it? Women are animals, and their mammary glands make fat for breast milk. Therefore, we shouldn’t have to cut down on burgers. Huh? Enough of that. What does the latest science tell us about nutrition and cancer? I’ve just talked about eating more fruits and vegetables. What are the other five recommendations that invoke the precautionary principle? Consumption of soy products may not only reduce the risk of getting breast cancer, but also increase chances of surviving it. In terms of dietary guidance suggestions on foods to cut down on, where evidence is sufficiently compelling, recommendations included “limiting or avoiding dairy products to reduce the risk of prostate cancer; limiting or avoiding alcohol to reduce the risk of cancers of the mouth, pharynx [throat], larynx, esophagus, colon, rectum, and breast; avoiding red and processed meat to reduce the risk of cancers of the colon and rectum; [and] avoiding grilled, fried, and broiled meats to reduce the risk of cancers of the colon, rectum, breast, prostate, kidney, and pancreas.” In this context, the researchers are talking about all meat, including poultry and fish. Look, we all have to make dietary decisions every day and “cannot wait for the evolution of scientific consensus.” Until we know more, all we can do to protect ourselves and our families is “act on the best available evidence” we have right now. The level of evidence required to make decisions depends on the level of risk. If we’re talking about a new drug, for example, given the fact that medications kill more than a hundred thousand Americans a year—which is Why Prevention Is Worth a Ton of Cure—you want to be darn sure that the benefits outweigh the risks before you prescribe or take a drug. But what level of evidence do you need to eat broccoli? Do you need randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials? (How would you even design a placebo vegetable?) Even if all of the evidence suggesting how powerful broccoli is turned out to be some crazy cruciferous conspiracy, what’s the worst that could have happened? It’s healthy anyway! That’s the beauty of safe, simple, and side effect–free solutions provided by the lifestyle medicine approach. They can only help. I have so many more videos on diet and cancer for you. How Not to Die from Cancer may be a good place to start before you check out some more in related videos. Key Takeaways Waiting for absolute scientific certainty may result in avoidable disease and even death. For example, had no-smoking efforts taken off when the association between smoking and lung cancer was first reported, instead of waiting for the link to be “absolutely clear,” lives could have been saved. The National Academy of Sciences released a landmark report on diet, nutrition, and cancer in 1982, which included interim guidance. Concerns were raised about processed meats, which were confirmed three decades later. Processed meat has been officially declared “carcinogenic to humans.” The 1982 report’s findings “generated a striking level of disbelief from the cancer community and outright hostility from people whose livelihood depended on foods in question and the food industry whose products were being questioned.” Invoking the precautionary principle, the latest science tells us to eat more fruits and vegetables, consume soy products to reduce breast cancer risk and increase chances of survival, and encourages “limiting or avoiding dairy products to reduce the risk of prostate cancer; limiting or avoiding alcohol to reduce the risk of cancers of the mouth, pharynx, larynx, esophagus, colon, rectum, and breast; avoiding red and processed meat to reduce the risk of cancers of the colon and rectum; [and] avoiding grilled, fried, and broiled meats to reduce the risk of cancers of the colon, rectum, breast, prostate, kidney, and pancreas.” In this context, the researchers are talking about all meat, including poultry and fish. We don’t have to wait, nor should we wait, for scientific consensus. We can and should “act on the best available evidence” we have right now. The beauty of safe, simple, and side effect–free solutions provided by the lifestyle medicine approach is that they can only help. To read the original article click here.

The post How to Eat to Reduce Cancer Risk appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Do Artificial Sweeteners Increase Your Cancer Risk?

AHA Publisher — Fri, 06 May 2022 07:00:31 +0000

Ethan Boldt via Dr. Axe – The widespread use of artificial sweeteners occurred, at the end of the day, because food and beverage manufacturers saw a business opportunity: They could tease their low-calorie foods or even zero-calorie drinks to potential customers who were looking to cut back on their calorie and sugar consumption. The bonus sounded too good to be true: You could enjoy the taste (okay, not quite like the real thing but close) of a soda or some chewing gum, for example, but without the calories, all the while helping your trim down. A win-win, right? That, of course, is not how it’s worked out. Already linked to worsening several chronic diseases, now artificial sweeteners are definitively linked to one of the worst diseases: cancer. Study: Artificial Sweeteners and Cancer Risk While artificial sweeteners were already linked to several chronic diseases, a group of French researchers noted the safety of these food additives remains a debated topic and conflicting reports abound. “In particular, their carcinogenicity has been suggested by several experimental studies, but robust epidemiological evidence is lacking.” Therefore, their objective was to examine the associations between artificial sweetener intakes and cancer risk, and this type of study was the first of its kind (investigating intakes as well as different types of sweeteners). The most commonly consumed artificial sweeteners were aspartame, acesulfame-K and sucralose, so they received the most scrutiny. Over 100,000 French adults were included in the study, with a median follow-up time of just under 8 years. Dietary intakes and consumption of sweeteners were tracked daily. Meanwhile, adjusted for other factors, links between sweeteners and cancer were assessed. In the end, researchers found a link between some artificial sweeteners — especially aspartame and acesulfame-K — and an increased risk for cancer. Higher risks were also recognized for breast cancer and obesity-related cancers. What It Means Simply put, these results suggest that artificial sweeteners “may represent a modifiable risk factor for cancer prevention,” says the authors. Remove them from your diet, lower your cancer risk. Seems like a no-brainer. Ultimately, of course, such a finding will also apply pressure to health and safety agencies across the world when it comes to the regulation of foods, beverages and other products that use artificial sweeteners. Study authors are already asking the European Food Safety Authority to re-evaluate food additive sweeteners. How to Avoid Artificial Sweeteners 1. Remove all products that contain artificial sweeteners from your diet Maybe you’re one of those people who eat a pretty healthy diet and consider a diet soda, for example, part of that approach. This study should dispel that notion. While many so-called diet foods and drinks can even be addictive, this study proves that these products are not worth the risk (i.e. cancer risk). 2. Do a solid label check to make sure artificial sweeteners aren’t sneaking into your diet The diet sodas and “sugar-free” chewing gums are pretty obvious. But did you know that artificial sweeteners are often found in fiber supplements, flavored water, meal replacement bars, sports drinks, yogurt and even vegetable juice?! Scour that nutrition label before purchasing. 3. Opt for natural low-calorie sweetener instead We’re not advocating that you suddenly switch back to sugar for your bit of sweetness (though a little can’t hurt you). Instead, try the many great natural sugar substitutes that exist today, such as no-calorie options stevia and monk fruit as well as natural sweeteners raw honey, maple syrup, banana puree and dates. For example, it’s easy to find soda, gum and even protein powder that’s sweetness comes from stevia rather than artificial sweetener. To read the original article click here.

The post Do Artificial Sweeteners Increase Your Cancer Risk? appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.