adverse reactions Archives - Amazing Health Advances

Frontline Doctors Develop Protocol to Help Those Injured by COVID Jab

AHA Publisher — Fri, 01 Jul 2022 07:00:16 +0000

Sara Middleton via NaturalHealth365 – Since the late 1980s, the number of petitions filed with the United States National Injury Compensation Program (VICP) seeking compensation for injury or death caused by vaxxes has increased considerably. Last year’s total (2,057) neared the historical peak of 2003 (2,592). It’s yet to be seen how the trend will play out over the next few years. Incredibly, more than half of these petitions have been dismissed, and not all cases that received actual compensation were necessarily able to “prove” that a vax caused the purported injury or illness (although one could safely surmise that the entire VICP process is bogged down with bureaucratic red tape and other behind-closed-doors decisions that protect the best interests of anyone but the vax-injured). Regardless, the point is clear: people have and will continue to be injured by the COVID shots currently authorized for use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Thankfully, while many public health officials, Big Pharma folks, and conventional healthcare providers are sticking their heads in the sand, some frontline doctors are taking a stand – and possibly risking their medical licenses by doing so – to help those who are harmed. No Conspiracy Here: Children and Adults Are Getting Hurt by COVID-19 Shots… But Are They Being Listened to? It’s hard to claim that we’re still in an “emergency” state when it comes to the pandemic (although that certainly isn’t stopping the FDA from authorizing the “emergency” use of the gene-based COVID shots for virtually everyone in the United States older than 6 months old). Meanwhile, data continues to emerge that muddies the water for anyone trying to make informed decisions about these injections. For instance, getting vaxxed seems to increase your risk of getting COVID-19 (a painfully ironic phenomenon known as “negative efficacy,”) which we can infer from the observation that highly vaxxed countries suffer from soaring infection and death rates compared to low vaxxed countries. Additionally, as summarized by Dr. Joseph Mercola in a recent newsletter, official vax safety surveillance data confirm that the mRNA jabs have “caused more harm in 18 months than all other vaxxes on the market, combined, over the past three decades.” And that’s even leaving alone the likelihood that VAERS is not capturing the true incidence of adverse effects from the COVID jabs due to the frustrating reality of adverse event underreporting. Of course, acknowledging that people are suffering serious and sometimes fatal issues because of these heavily propagandized drugs in no way ignores the fact that people have also been suffering because of COVID-19. But bringing to light this issue hopefully will encourage more providers to at least put vax injury on their radar when seeing people suffering from problems such as strokes, fall-related injuries after fainting episodes, heart inflammation, worsening chronic illness, “sudden unexplained deaths,” and more. Because truthfully, if doctors aren’t even considering the possibility that their patients’ suffering could be related to recent jabs due to ignorance or fear of professional repercussions, how would a potential link ever be uncovered? If patients aren’t listened to when they show up to urgent care clinics and emergency rooms, if their concerns are downplayed or ignored, or if their symptoms aren’t reported to VAERS, then how exactly will ongoing safety monitoring of these shots ever be appropriately carried out? Here Are Some Things You Can Do If You Develop Post-Vax Syndrome Following a COVID Shot, According to Frontline Experts The Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) is a group of healthcare providers – led by esteemed Pulmonary and Critical Care Specialists Dr. Pierre Kory, M.D., M.P.A., and Dr. Paul E. Marik, M.D., FCCM, FCCP – who have created and shared life-saving, evidence-based protocols for patients throughout the pandemic (protocols that often go against mainstream messaging and are therefore frequently censored). Now, they’ve developed a protocol specifically for people who have suffered illness or injury following a COVID jab. The FLCCC endorses the importance of such a protocol given that “a temporal correlation between a patient receiving a COVID-19 vaccine and beginning or worsening of clinical manifestations is sufficient to diagnose as a COVID-19 vaccine-induced injury when the symptoms are unexplained by other concurrent causes.” If you’re curious, here are some “first-line” treatments from the FLCCC Alliance’s “I-RECOVER POST-VACCINE TREATMENT PROTOCOL” (the protocol includes many more treatments as well, including several non-pharmacological options): Intermittent daily fasting Vitamin C, D, and K2 Magnesium Melatonin Quercetin Nigella Sava Omega-3 fatty acids Ivermectin Aspirin Readers note: the FLCCC encourages patients to consult with a healthcare provider before starting any new treatment protocol, and that any treatment protocol should be individualized based on each patient’s needs. Keep this in mind as you search for a healthcare provider you can trust with your family’s health and wellbeing. Sources for this article include: Statista.com Rumble.com COVID19criticalcare.com Mercola.com Mercola.com To read the original article click here.

The post Frontline Doctors Develop Protocol to Help Those Injured by COVID Jab appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Shedding: New Concerns – Are Vaxxed People a Danger to the Un-vaxxed?

AHA Publisher — Wed, 12 May 2021 07:00:54 +0000

Sara Middleton via NaturalHealth365 – $26 billion: that’s how much money Pfizer expects to make in 2021 thanks to its COVID shot, accounting for more than one-third of the pharmaceutical giant’s sales. But even as Pfizer reportedly plans to file for full FDA approval of its experimental drug this month, doctors and individuals are beginning to raise serious questions over the possibility that this experimental drug could be shedding or causing harm to people who are choosing to remain shot-free, including severely altered menstruation. What We Know About Viral Shedding — from Natural Infections and Injections Viral shedding of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, happens when the virus is released from an infected person’s body via sneezing, coughing, breathing, or speaking. The shed virus can then spread from person to person. It’s a well-established phenomenon that injections containing live yet weakened versions of viruses can also shed. For example, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states on their website that shedding is “common” with the live attenuated flu shot. And a 2012 paper published in Pediatrics Child Health admits to the circulation of a “vaccine-type measles virus,” adding to a growing suspicion that the mumps-measles-rubella (MMR) injection itself may drive some measles “outbreaks.” Anecdotal evidence points to altered periods, other unusual symptoms in people who haven’t received the experimental COVID shot (but are around people who have) During the COVID-19 pandemic, thousands of unvaccinated people share alarming anecdotal experiences about unusual health problems after being around people who have received the experimental COVID shots, including severely altered menstruation cycles, miscarriages, and COVID-19 symptoms and/or positive test results. In light of this, a question has been circulating: Can the COVID shot harm people who haven’t received it? Current medical consensus states that shedding cannot happen from injections that do not contain a live virus, as is the case with the mRNA COVID shots from Pfizer and Moderna. And although the Johnson & Johnson shot contains live versions of an adenovirus, the adenovirus reportedly can’t replicate, and therefore the shot allegedly unable to shed. Despite these assurances, questions remain. For a thorough discussion about this topic from a podcast with informed consent proponents Dr. Carrie Madej, Dr. Lee Merritt, and Dr. Christiane Northrup, click here. Overall, there is not enough data yet to confirm whether COVID shots can shed. Current (conventional) scientific evidence suggests not. But the overwhelming amount of personal stories that suggest something else is going on just should not be overlooked and so swiftly downplayed — not when the drugs are still in their experimental phases. After all, since the Big Pharma companies have not disclosed all the ingredients they used in their experimental drugs, it’s not outside the realm of possibility that something in the COVID shots could be causing harm to unvaxxed individuals. For instance, a preprint study from March 2021 released on BioRxiv found that antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are being detected in the saliva of mRNA shot recipients. This presents the possibility that these antibodies are spreading to others from vaxxed people and affecting their health. Pfizer also reportedly used strands of the bacteria E. coli to make the shot, and it’s unknown if there are any residual bits of E. coli in the final product. As with many things about the pandemic, time will tell. Stay tuned, as we continue to monitor this issue very closely. Sources for this article include: Rumble.com Finance.Yahoo.com TGHN.org Nebraskamed.com Mayoclinic.org NIH.gov Montanadailygazette.com CDC.gov Biorxiv.org Northwestern.edu To read the original article click here. For more articles from NaturalHealth365 click here.

The post Shedding: New Concerns – Are Vaxxed People a Danger to the Un-vaxxed? appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

‘Lockdowns Are a Big Mistake:’ World Health Organization and Other Experts Now ADMIT Global Economic Shutdowns for COVID-19 Are WRONG

AHA Publisher — Mon, 19 Oct 2020 07:00:04 +0000

Sara Middleton via NaturalHealth365 – In a reversal few saw coming but most understand, officials from the World Health Organization (WHO) has finally condemned the global economic shutdowns. Far from saving people’s lives, these shutdowns have in their estimation caused “irreparable damage” to citizens of the world – especially the most vulnerable among us – and have sparked a concerning upward trend of poverty and mental health issues. The concern is so widespread and severe that epidemiologists from Stanford University, Oxford University, and Harvard University have put together a petition calling to finally end the unethical madness of COVID lockdowns. WHO ADMITS: COVID lockdowns made “poor people an awful lot poorer” and may double the rates of malnutrition In an interview with British media outlet The Spectator, Dr. David Nabarro of the WHO admitted that “we…do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of [the novel coronavirus pandemic].” Are you surprised, Governor Newsom and Governor Cuomo?! According to Dr. Nabarro, an unavoidable consequence of the lockdown has been “making poor people an awful lot poorer….It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition.” He cites economic devastation in regions like the Caribbean as examples of the profound mess lockdowns and travel restrictions have caused. Mental health consequences of these ill-advised and protracted shutdowns cannot be ignored, either. For example, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced in August that there were “considerably elevated adverse mental health conditions associated with COVID-19,” with fully 40% of American adults struggling with worsening mental health, increased thoughts of suicide, and increased use of drugs and alcohol. “The only time we believe a lockdown is justified,” Dr. Nabarro continued in The Spectator, “is to buy you time to reorganise, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.” And as battered as the WHO’s reputation may be, their concerns are fully supported by a growing collection of international experts from the fields of epidemiology, finance, public health, psychiatry, and more. “The Great Barrington Declaration” makes these key points about ending the economic shutdowns … can we call on our local and national leaders to pay attention? Spearheaded by Ivy league professors, a petition called the Great Barrington Declaration is making its rounds and currently features over 40,000 signatures. It calls to end the current lockdown policies which “are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health.” Here are a few key points from the petition: The lockdowns are contributing to “worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health,” among other issues – the effects of which will be felt for years to come COVID-19 is less dangerous for children than the seasonal flu (which the CDC isn’t even surveilling right now, according to their website); it follows that keeping kids out of school is considered a “grave injustice” Indeed, continuing the lockdown for everyone is unconscionable – extracurricular activities, schools, restaurants, and businesses should be open and “those who are not vulnerable” (that is, anyone who is not old or chronically ill) should be “immediately” allowed to “resume life as normal“ Lastly, say what you will about “herd immunity,” but an important point should not be lost here: this cohort of the world’s leading epidemiologists and physicians admit that building of coronavirus immunity throughout the population is “notdependent” on a vaccine. Therefore, holding the world hostage until a vaccine is available is simply not the way to minimize deaths and social harm. Time will tell when world leaders will finally pay attention and heed these dire warnings. Sources for this article include: Infectioncontroltoday.com, CDC.gov, GBDeclaration.org, News.com.au, CDC.gov To read the original article click here. For more articles from NaturalHealth365 click here.

The post ‘Lockdowns Are a Big Mistake:’ World Health Organization and Other Experts Now ADMIT Global Economic Shutdowns for COVID-19 Are WRONG appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

FDA Urges Consumers to Avoid Certain Brands of Toxic Hand Sanitizers That May Contain Methanol

AHA Publisher — Wed, 05 Aug 2020 07:00:07 +0000

Andrea Morris via CBN News – The use of hand sanitizer has become a standard practice after the WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic back in March. The announcement sparked fear among millions, triggering them to panic purchase hand sanitizer which led to a national shortage. Production of the product ramped up and new brands hit store shelves, but the Food and Drug Associationbecame concerned over some sanitizers that potentially contained the dangerous ingredient methanol. Now, the FDA is taking action to alert consumers of the hazards associated with methanol and which products to avoid using. In a report from July 2, the FDA said it is “warning consumers and health care providers that the agency has seen a sharp increase in hand sanitizer products that are labeled to contain ethanol (also known as ethyl alcohol) but that have tested positive for methanol contamination. Methanol, or wood alcohol, is a substance that can be toxic when absorbed through the skin or ingested and can be life-threatening when ingested.” The agency announced that adults and children who ingested certain hand sanitizers tainted with methanol experienced “nausea, vomiting, headache, blurred vision, permanent blindness, seizures, coma, permanent damage to the nervous system or death.” According to an “import alert” issued by the FDA on July 31, many of the hand sanitizers appear to have been manufactured in Mexico and should be avoided due to their potential health hazards. And the organization says it’s working to keep dangerous products out of the United States. “We remain extremely concerned about the potential serious risks of alcohol-based hand sanitizers containing methanol,” FDA Commissioner Stephen M. Hahn said in a statement. “Producing, importing, and distributing toxic hand sanitizers poses a serious threat to the public and will not be tolerated.” The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) describe methanol as toxic alcohol that is colorless and watery. It is used as a solvent and pesticide which can be absorbed into the body by inhalation, ingestion, skin contact, or through eye contact. Find FDA information on contaminated hand sanitizers and the product code at the agency’s web site here. To read the original article click here. For more articles from CBN News click here.

The post FDA Urges Consumers to Avoid Certain Brands of Toxic Hand Sanitizers That May Contain Methanol appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.