Vaccines Archives - Amazing Health Advances

Poll: Almost Half of U.S. Respondents Demand Reevaluation of CDC Vaccine Schedule

The AHA! Team — Wed, 13 Aug 2025 05:33:15 +0000

Ramon Tomey via Natural News – In a striking shift, nearly half of U.S. respondents in an opinion poll now support reexamining the childhood vaccination schedule recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). A poll by Children’s Health Defense reveals 49.4 percent of respondents favor reviewing the CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule, while only 29.6 percent oppose changes. Support rises to nearly 60 percent among parents of young children. While 43 percent still back school vaccine requirements, 39 percent argue public education access should not depend on vaccination status. New CDC appointees, including Martin Kulldorff, are scrutinizing vaccine safety, including cumulative effects of ingredients. Critics accuse the panel of promoting “anti-vaccine” views. Nearly half (48 percent) support legal recourse for vaccine-related harm, challenging the 1986 law shielding manufacturers from liability. The CDC’s review of thimerosal in flu shots revisits past autism concerns. The poll reflects eroded trust in vaccine mandates, signaling a shift away from unquestioned acceptance. In a striking shift, nearly half of U.S. respondents in an opinion poll now support reexamining the childhood vaccination schedule recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The survey, conducted by John Zogby Strategies and commissioned by Children’s Health Defense (CHD), polled 1,006 respondents from June 24 to 25. It found that 49.4 percent – 23.7 percent strongly support, 25.7 percent somehow support – are in favor of a reevaluation of the CDC’s vaccine schedule. In contrast, only 29.6 percent of respondents – 15.1 percent strongly oppose, 14.5 percent somewhat oppose – prefer to keep the vaccination schedule as is. The poll’s results also revealed that support for reviewing the vaccine schedule spikes to almost 60 percent among parents of young children – a demographic directly impacted by the recommendations. Under the current schedule, children must be injected with 70 doses of 15 vaccines by age 18. Meanwhile, 43 percent of respondents still endorse school vaccine mandates. Nevertheless, 39 percent of respondents argue public education access should remain unconditional instead of being contingent on compliance with vaccine mandates. (Related: MASS EXODUS from public schools anticipated after CDC advisory panel unanimously votes to add deadly Covid-19 “vaccines” to childhood immunization schedule.) People want vaccine injury accountability The opinion poll’s results come amid escalating scrutiny of federal vaccine policies, particularly after Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. overhauled the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) with appointees who criticize mainstream vaccine guidance. Central to the controversy is a newly formed CDC work group tasked with studying the cumulative effects of childhood vaccines. “It is important to evaluate interaction effects between different vaccines, cumulative amounts of vaccine ingredients, and relative timing,” said new ACIP Chairman Martin Kulldorff during the panel’s June 25 meeting. His remarks echoed a 2013 National Academy of Medicine report urging deeper research into vaccine safety, a call left unheeded for over a decade. Critics, including mainstream medical groups, accuse the panel of veering toward anti-vaccine ideology. The American Academy of Pediatrics blasted Kulldorff’s suggestion to delay hepatitis B vaccinations as “unscientific” and “dangerous.” Typically given at birth, the new ACIP chairman said the injection can be delayed “unless the mother is hepatitis B positive.” Yet CHD CEO Mary Holland argues the poll reflects a public revolt against institutional dogma. “The constant fearmongering and shaming tactics … are not only ineffective, but backfiring,” she said. “This data clearly shows that the mainstream media, medical establishment and many politicians fail to hear the serious concerns of half of Americans on these vital issues.” Equally contentious is the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which shields manufacturers from liability. Nearly half of respondents – 48 percent – now support legal recourse for vaccine injuries. In contrast, just 34 percent defend the status quo. This debate started in the 1990s, when mercury-based thimerosal first ignited autism concerns. Kennedy has long cited studies linking vaccines to neurological harm, though federal agencies and major medical journals reject those claims. Thimerosal was later removed from most childhood vaccines in 2001. The new ACIP’s review of thimerosal-preserved flu shots reignites that clash. Whether the CDC’s review yields policy changes or further polarization, one truth is clear. The era of unquestioned vaccine mandates is over. Sources include: ChildrensHealthDefense.org 1 ChildrensHealthDefense.org 2 [PDF] NBCNews.com Brighteon.com To read the original article, click here

The post Poll: Almost Half of U.S. Respondents Demand Reevaluation of CDC Vaccine Schedule appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

COVID-19 Vaccine Shedding? New Research Concerns Over Menstrual Abnormalities

The AHA! Team — Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:21:35 +0000

Lance D Johnson via Natural News – In the midst of the 15th-century Black Plague, a group of spice traders turned thieves defied the odds, robbing plague victims and their graves without succumbing to the deadly disease. Their secret? A potent blend of essential oils that protected them from infection. A new study links unvaccinated women near COVID-19-vaccinated individuals to menstrual irregularities, suggesting possible vaccine “shedding.” The study raises concerns about mRNA vaccine safety and the lack of pre-rollout shedding studies. Critics highlight censorship of women reporting menstrual changes and call for transparency in vaccine research. Researchers urge further investigation into vaccine component transmission and emphasize the need for informed consent. In a groundbreaking study published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, researchers uncovered a startling connection: Unvaccinated women who were in close proximity to individuals who received COVID-19 vaccines reported experiencing menstrual irregularities similar to those reported by vaccinated women. Unvaccinated women who were in close proximity to individuals who received COVID-19 vaccines reported experiencing menstrual irregularities similar to those reported by vaccinated women. The findings, which suggest the possibility of vaccine “shedding,” have reignited debates over the safety of mRNA vaccines and the Biden administration’s aggressive push for mass vaccination without adequate long-term testing. The study, led by researchers including Dr. Brian Hooker, Chief Scientific Officer of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), analyzed survey data from 3,390 unvaccinated women with no prior COVID-19 infection. Of these women, 85.5% reported being within six feet of a vaccinated person, and 71.7% experienced irregular menstrual symptoms within one week of exposure. The study’s authors noted that the timing and severity of these symptoms were statistically significant, raising questions about whether vaccine components could be transmitted from vaccinated to unvaccinated individuals. The study found that unvaccinated women who had daily close contact with vaccinated individuals outside their households were at the highest risk of menstrual irregularities, including heavier bleeding (34%), early period onset (28%), and extended bleeding (26%). Interestingly, women who lived with vaccinated partners or household members did not show the same increased risk, suggesting that environmental factors or prolonged exposure to larger groups of vaccinated individuals may play a role. Dr. Hooker emphasized that while the study does not definitively prove vaccine shedding, it provides compelling evidence that warrants further investigation. “This important study affirms that women exposed to individuals outside their household who received modified mRNA jabs for COVID-19 indeed experienced significantly higher levels of menstrual issues…” he told The Defender. Vaccine mandates and censorship put women at risk The study’s findings have reignited criticism of the Biden administration’s handling of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. The administration and its allies on social media platforms actively silenced women who reported menstrual irregularities following vaccination. In 2021, a Facebook group with over 20,000 members sharing personal testimonies about menstrual changes was abruptly deleted, stifling crucial conversations about vaccine safety. Tiffany Parotto, founder of MyCycleStory and a co-author of the study, highlighted the importance of giving women a voice. “The need to research these occurrences and give a voice to the women who were silenced was obvious,” she wrote. The study also raises questions about the lack of pre-rollout shedding studies for mRNA vaccines. Nicolas Hulscher, an epidemiologist at the McCullough Foundation, pointed out that the FDA issued guidance for shedding studies in 2015 for gene therapies but failed to apply the same standards to COVID-19 vaccines. “Why didn’t our regulatory agencies conduct shedding studies before mass product rollout?” he asked. The study’s authors called for increased funding and research into the potential transmission of vaccine components, emphasizing the need for transparency and informed consent. Dr. Pierre Kory, president emeritus of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, described the findings as “highly compelling” and urged regulatory agencies to take immediate action. Heather Ray, a science and research analyst with CHD, criticized the systemic gaslighting of women who reported adverse effects. “Over the past four years, women have continually been gaslighted, censored, and silenced by the media, the medical system, and government agencies regarding their experiences with the COVID-19 shot,” she said. The study’s findings underscore the need for a more cautious and transparent approach to vaccine development and distribution. While the Biden administration and social media platforms have dismissed concerns about menstrual irregularities, this research highlights the importance of listening to women’s experiences and conducting thorough safety studies before mandating experimental treatments. As the debate over vaccine safety continues, one thing is clear: women’s health should never be an afterthought. Sources for this article include: X.com ChildrensHealthDefense.org ChildrensHealthDefense.org To read the original article, click here

The post COVID-19 Vaccine Shedding? New Research Concerns Over Menstrual Abnormalities appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Yale Study Finds Spike Proteins from COVID Jabs Persist for TWO YEARS: Are mRNA Vaccines Rewriting Human DNA?

The AHA! Team — Mon, 17 Feb 2025 06:06:15 +0000

Lance D Johnson via Natural News – Researchers find spike proteins in vaccinated individuals TWO YEARS after inoculation. Yale scientists find COVID spike protein in vaccinated individuals up to two years post-vaccination. Study suggests mRNA genetic material may integrate with human DNA, activating protein-making structures. Renowned scientist Dr. Akiko Iwasaki, who initially supported mRNA vaccines, now leads the study. Vaccine skeptics warn of DNA contamination risks, citing evidence of self-replicating mRNA and reverse transcription. Research reveals mRNA vaccines may induce chronic inflammation, blood clotting, and neurological damage. Findings challenge claims of temporary, localized mRNA effects, raising concerns about long-term health impacts. Evidence suggests vaccinated individuals may become “super spreaders” of spike proteins, potentially endangering public health. Researchers find spike proteins in vaccinated individuals TWO YEARS after inoculation Scientists are raising alarms about the long-term consequences of these experimental COVID-19 injections. New findings from Yale University suggest that the genetic material in mRNA vaccines may not only persist in the human body but could also integrate with human DNA, fundamentally altering our genetic code. This disturbing discovery has profound implications for the health of billions of people worldwide and raises urgent questions about the ethics and safety of mRNA vaccine technology. Yale researchers have identified COVID spike proteins in the blood of vaccinated individuals — up to two years after they received their shots. Crucially, these individuals were never infected with the virus, as confirmed by antibody tests. The immune system typically destroys newly produced spike proteins, but the persistence of these proteins suggests that some vaccinated individuals may be producing them independently. A plausible explanation is that the genetic material delivered by the vaccines has integrated with human genes, activating protein-making structures within cells. If confirmed, this would mark a seismic shift in our understanding of mRNA vaccine safety. The implications of this discovery are staggering. More than a billion people worldwide have received mRNA COVID vaccines, and the possibility that these vaccines are altering human DNA is a game-changer. The consequences could extend far beyond the immediate health risks of Covid-19, potentially leading to chronic inflammation, autoimmune disorders, and long-term organ damage. The spike proteins produced by these vaccines are not benign; they are known to cause blood clotting, neurological inflammation, and even prion-like formations in the brain, which are linked to Alzheimer’s disease. The lead researcher on this groundbreaking study is Dr. Akiko Iwasaki, a renowned immunologist and former president of the American Association of Immunologists. Dr. Iwasaki was once a vocal advocate for mRNA vaccines, dismissing concerns about their safety as “absurd.” However, her team’s findings now suggest that those concerns may have been valid all along. The study, known as LISTEN, began in 2022 and has enrolled approximately 3,000 participants who reported post-vaccine injuries. The researchers have found spike proteins in participants’ blood samples more than 700 days after their last mRNA shot, a finding that challenges the narrative of temporary, localized mRNA effects. Welcome to the dark side of transhumanism The possibility of genetic integration is not a new concern among vaccine skeptics. Some researchers have long warned that the mRNA vaccines could contaminate human DNA, a process known as “transfection.” The manufacturing process of mRNA vaccines involves the use of DNA plasmids, which can lead to small amounts of DNA contamination in the final product. While federal standards limit allowable DNA contamination to 10 nano grams per dose, the lipid nanoparticles used to protect the mRNA may also shield the DNA contaminants, potentially allowing them to integrate into human genes. Recent research by Kevin McKernan and others has provided further evidence of DNA contamination in vaccine vials, raising questions about the adequacy of current regulatory standards. Dr. Richard M. Fleming, a nuclear cardiologist, has also warned that mRNA vaccines are self-replicating and may turn individuals into “never-ending spike protein factories.” His research suggests that the genetic sequence for SARS-CoV-2 is designed to self-assemble and self-amplify, integrating into human DNA through reverse transcription. This process could hijack healthy genetic expression, leading to chronic inflammation and organ damage for years to come. The consequences of these findings are nothing short of alarming. Vaccinated individuals may not only suffer long-term health consequences but could also become “super spreaders” of spike proteins, potentially endangering public health for generations. The idea that mRNA vaccines could rewrite human DNA and turn individuals into perpetual bioweapon vectors is a chilling prospect, one that aligns with the emerging field of transhumanism. As genetic updates become the norm, the line between human and machine blurs, raising ethical questions about autonomy, consent, and the future of humanity. Sources include: AlexBerensen.substack.com Medicine.Yale.edu NaturalNews.com To read the original article, click here

The post Yale Study Finds Spike Proteins from COVID Jabs Persist for TWO YEARS: Are mRNA Vaccines Rewriting Human DNA? appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Merck Faces New Controversy Over Mumps Shot Development Practices

The AHA! Team — Wed, 06 Nov 2024 06:03:10 +0000

Patrick Tims via NaturalHealth365 – Merck is back in the spotlight, facing serious accusations over how it developed its latest mumps shot. Merck is back in the spotlight, facing serious accusations over how it developed its latest mumps shot. According to recently released legal documents, the drugmaker may have cut corners in its rush to bring the shot to market, potentially putting children’s health at risk. Concerns are growing that these actions may compromise vaccine safety and reflect broader issues within the company’s development practices. Merck’s latest mumps shot comes under fire Alarming reports claim Merck’s shot contains up to 4 times the approved amount of live virus – up to 600,000 viral particles per dose, compared to the FDA’s recommendation of 160,000. Shockingly, immunity can be triggered with just 20,000 particles. Some even accuse Merck of intentionally inflating the amount of live virus to falsely boost the vaccine’s “effectiveness,” all while failing to conduct proper safety tests. What’s worse, the company appears to have gone to great lengths to hide these practices from regulators. Despite these concerning findings, health agencies and the government have yet to take action to address or halt the vaccine’s distribution. Rewind time back to 2010, and Merck employees filed a lawsuit claiming the company’s mumps vaccine had 400% of the approved concentration level of the virus. The drugmaker’s whistleblowers filed the lawsuit under the False Claims Act. The insinuation is that Merck overfilled its mumps shots for 12-18-month-olds with many times the approved level of the live mumps virus, opting for passive surveillance instead of transparency. Such passive surveillance took the form of parents’ reports detailing kids’ reactions to the jabs. Other shots facing serious scrutiny Merck’s mumps shot is just the latest in a growing list of shots facing serious scrutiny. Alarming reports have emerged about other jabs, raising concerns about transparency, safety, and rushed approvals. The flu shot, for instance, has been criticized for inconsistent effectiveness, leaving many to question why it’s still pushed so aggressively each year despite these flaws. The COVID-19 shots, fast-tracked under emergency use, are another example. Critics argue that the long-term effects are still unknown, and the lack of comprehensive safety data raises red flags. Whistleblower accounts and legal documents suggest that pharmaceutical giants may have prioritized speed and profit over rigorous safety standards, potentially compromising the health of millions. Parents have every reason to be cautious. With so many unanswered questions and unsettling information coming to light, it’s crucial to dig deeper, research the ingredients, and understand what’s really going into these vaccines before making decisions about your child’s health. Protect your child with a holistic approach to well-being As a parent, you should do your due diligence – research the shots, understand the ingredients, and explore all available information. In addition to informed decision-making, you can naturally support your child’s immune system. Ensure they follow a balanced diet rich in organic fruits, vegetables, and other nutrient-dense foods. Encourage healthy habits like getting at least 7 – 9 hours of sleep, practicing good hygiene, regular physical activity, and stress management techniques. Natural immune boosters, including foods like leafy greens, berries, citrus fruits, legumes, seeds, and nuts, can provide valuable support. You might also consider incorporating daily probiotics for gut health and herbs like elderberry or echinacea. However, always consult a holistic healthcare provider before introducing new supplements or herbal remedies into your child’s routine. Sources for this article include: Childrenshealthdefense.org Childrenshealthdefense.org Childrenshealthdefense.org Justice.gov To read the original article click here.

The post Merck Faces New Controversy Over Mumps Shot Development Practices appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.