Coronavirus (Covid-19) Archives - Amazing Health Advances

Impact of COVID-19 on Education Not Going Away, UM Study Finds

The AHA! Team — Wed, 16 Jul 2025 05:09:02 +0000

University of Mississippi via EurekAlert! – Student performance scores dipped following the COVID-19 pandemic, and recent UM research shows they have not returned to pre-pandemic levels. The team discovered that a loss of life skills normally developed in high school that prepare students to succeed may be to blame. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on student performance is well known, but four years after the pandemic, scores in college classes are not returning to their pre-pandemic levels. A University of Mississippi study might point to an answer. In a study published in a special issue of the Educational Sciences journal, three Ole Miss researchers found that student performance scores started a downward trend following COVID-19. Dozens of studies have documented the pandemic’s negative impact on education, but the Ole Miss team discovered evidence of a deeper problem. “We were a little puzzled at first because if learning was impacted by one big event, why didn’t scores drop and level off or start to climb again?” said Gregg Davidson, professor of geology and geological engineering. “Why did scores continue declining each year since COVID-19?” The researchers – Gregg Davidson; Kristin Davidson, lecturer in computer and information science; and Hong Xiao, assistant professor of computer and information science – make the case that it was not just missed exposure to educational material during school shutdowns, but a loss of life skills normally developed in high school that prepare students to succeed both in college and future careers. “As educators, recognizing that this is happening is important in order to be proactive about identifying causes and remedies,” Davidson said. These skills include time management, self-motivation, critical thinking and social interaction. Without these skills, students can struggle to stay engaged, manage coursework and seek help when needed, directly affecting their academic performance, the researchers said. “I started studying this before the pandemic when I was doing my dissertation for my Ph.D. program in higher education,” Kristin Davidson said. “I knew from day one I wanted to look at the difference between online and face-to-face classroom performance, because I believed there was something there. “Following the pandemic, the study expanded to determine if the impact of school shutdowns changed anything – and did it ever.” Prior to the pandemic, a student’s performance scores in online classes were often lower than for equivalent classes taken face-to-face. Highly motivated students who earned As in face-to-face settings usually got A’s in online classes, too. But students who received Bs or below for face-to-face classes were likely to drop by a full letter grade in online courses. For these students, the structure of a regular meeting schedule, with instructor-controlled pace, minimal distractions and fellow students nearby, normally translated into better performance, the researchers said. “Post-COVID, that structural benefit disappeared. The performance of students in the face-to-face classes dropped to be indistinguishable from the online scores,” Gregg Davidson said. Steady decline in scores The steady decline in scores in college classes provides additional evidence that students still in high school during shutdowns were more impacted than those already in college, he said. “The scores are a reflection of growing percentage of undergraduates each year who were in high school during the pandemic.” Hong Xiao analyzed more than 15,000 records from non-major geology courses over eight years. At the end of 2023 – the last year covered during the study – student performance scores showed no signs of improving. The findings The findings draw attention to the need for being intentional about life skill development before arriving at college and after. Those skills are critical for academic, professional, and personal success, the researchers said. “That can start with family,” Xiao said. “Family is their first major connection.” DOI 10.3390/educsci14111268 To read the original article click here.

The post Impact of COVID-19 on Education Not Going Away, UM Study Finds appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

2025: 6 Natural & Integrative Strategies to Prevent & Fight the Flu

The AHA! Team — Wed, 09 Apr 2025 05:12:29 +0000

Dr. Don Colbert – Understanding the Different Types of Influenza. There are four main types of influenza, but Influenza A and B are the most concerning for humans: ✔️ Influenza A – The most severe and capable of causing pandemics. Strains like H1N1 and H3N2 have led to major outbreaks. ✔️ Influenza B – Also responsible for seasonal flu, but does not cause pandemics. ✔️ Influenza C – Causes mild respiratory illness and is not a major health concern. ✔️ Influenza D – Primarily affects cattle and is not known to infect humans. 🔹 Dr. Colbert’s Take: The immune system is your best defense against any strain of the flu. He recommends boosting immunity naturally with a healthy diet, proper rest, hydration, and strategic supplementation. Why the Flu Changes Every Year You may have heard that the flu is “different every year.” This is because of: ✔️ Antigenic drift – Small genetic mutations in the flu virus that cause new variants to appear each year. This is why flu vaccines need to be updated annually. ✔️ Antigenic shift – A major, sudden change in the virus that can lead to a pandemic. 🔹 Dr. Colbert’s Take: Instead of relying solely on yearly flu shots, he suggests strengthening your body’s natural defenses with Vitamin D, zinc, and probiotics, which play a crucial role in immune function. What Makes Some Flu Strains Worse Than Others? Not all flu viruses are created equal. Some are far more severe due to: ✔️ Mutations – Some strains mutate in ways that make them more aggressive. ✔️ Immune response – Certain flu types trigger an intense immune reaction, leading to high fever, inflammation, and respiratory distress. ✔️ Lack of immunity – If a strain is new, most people have little to no immunity, allowing it to spread rapidly. 🔹 Dr. Colbert’s Take: A weak immune system increases the risk of complications. He recommends cutting back on sugar and processed foods, as they can suppress immune function for hours after consumption. How Contagious Is the Flu? The flu spreads easily through: ✔️ Respiratory droplets – Coughing, sneezing, and talking can spread the virus up to six feet. ✔️ Touching contaminated surfaces – The virus can survive for hours to days on objects. ✔️ Before symptoms appear – You can be contagious one day before symptoms start and up to seven days after. 🔹 Dr. Colbert’s Take: Avoid crowded places during flu season, and wash your hands frequently. He also recommends using natural antimicrobials like oregano oil and elderberry to help fight off viral invaders. How Long Does the Flu Virus Last on Surfaces? The flu virus can survive for different lengths of time depending on the surface: ✔️ Hard surfaces (doorknobs, light switches, countertops) – Up to 24–48 hours ✔️ Soft surfaces (clothing, fabric, tissues) – A few hours ✔️ Hands and skin – Minutes to hours 🔹 Dr. Colbert’s Take: Regularly disinfect surfaces in your home using natural antiviral agents like vinegar, hydrogen peroxide, and essential oils such as tea tree and eucalyptus. How Do Most People Catch the Flu? The most common ways people get the flu include: ✔️ Direct contact with infected individuals – Being around someone who is sneezing or coughing. ✔️ Touching contaminated objects – Flu germs can linger on surfaces like shopping carts, door handles, and cell phones. ✔️ Poor hand hygiene – Touching your face (eyes, nose, mouth) after contact with contaminated objects. 🔹 Dr. Colbert’s Take: One of the simplest yet most effective flu prevention strategies is washing your hands often and keeping your immune system strong with nutrient-dense foods. What to Do When a Family Member Gets the Flu If someone in your home gets sick, take these steps to protect the rest of the family: ✔️ Isolate the sick person – Have them stay in a separate room if possible. ✔️ Use separate utensils and towels – Prevent cross-contamination. ✔️ Disinfect frequently touched areas – Doorknobs, remote controls, and countertops. ✔️ Encourage hydration and rest – Proper fluids and sleep help the body recover faster. ✔️ Wear a mask – If caring for a sick family member, a mask can help reduce exposure. 🔹 Dr. Colbert’s Take: Supporting the body’s natural recovery process is crucial. He recommends bone broth, herbal teas, and immune-boosting supplements like quercetin and vitamin C to speed up recovery. Conventional Approaches: Flu Shots and Antivirals While many doctors recommend annual flu shots, Dr. Colbert believes they are not a one-size-fits-all solution. If you choose the flu shot, ensure it is thimerosal-free to avoid mercury-based preservatives. Tamiflu (oseltamivir) is commonly prescribed to shorten flu duration but may cause side effects such as nausea and dizziness. Dr. Colbert encourages natural antiviral and immune-boosting strategies before resorting to medication. 6 Integrative and Natural Strategies to Strengthen the Immune System 1. Essential Vitamins Vitamin D3: Supports immune function; recommended dosage: 5,000 IU daily. Vitamin C: An antioxidant that combats oxidative stress; take 1,000-2,000 mg daily. Zinc: Antiviral properties that reduce flu symptoms; recommended intake: 25-50 mg daily. 2. Herbal and Natural Remedies Echinacea: Boosts immune response. Oregano Oil: A natural antimicrobial. Garlic: A potent antiviral that strengthens immunity. 3. Probiotics for Gut Health A strong immune system starts with gut health. Probiotics balance gut bacteria and enhance immunity. Consume fermented foods or take a high-quality probiotic supplement. Diet and Nutrition for Flu Prevention Diet plays a crucial role in immune support. Certain foods strengthen immunity, while others compromise it. 4. Foods to Avoid Refined Sugars: Weakens white blood cells, making infections more likely. Hydrogenated Fats: Increase inflammation and slow immune response. Excess Alcohol: Depletes immune-boosting nutrients like vitamin C and zinc. 5. Foods to Include Leafy Greens: Rich in vitamins and antioxidants for immune defense. Citrus Fruits: High in vitamin C, aiding in flu symptom reduction. Garlic and Onions: Contain natural antiviral and antimicrobial properties. Bone Broth: Supports gut health and provides key immune-enhancing amino acids. Green Supremefood: A nutrient-dense blend of greens, probiotics, and antioxidants for enhanced immunity. 6. Superfood Supplements for Immune Support Green Supremefood: Antioxidants, probiotics, and nutrients to fortify immunity. Immune Support Supplement: A blend of quercetin, zinc, and elderberry, vitamin c and vitamin d3. Nano-Glutathione: A powerful antioxidant for detoxification and immune resilience. Final Thoughts Instead of solely relying on flu shots and medications, strengthening your immune system naturally can make the difference in preparing your body’s natural defenses to ward off the flu. With nutrient-rich foods, strategic supplementation, and healthy lifestyle habits, you can defend and recover from the flu effectively. By taking an integrative approach, you can restore, rebuild, and renew your body’s defenses. After all, God designed our immune system with incredible capabilities—let’s support it the right way! To read the original article click here.

The post 2025: 6 Natural & Integrative Strategies to Prevent & Fight the Flu appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

COVID-19 Vaccine Shedding? New Research Concerns Over Menstrual Abnormalities

The AHA! Team — Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:21:35 +0000

Lance D Johnson via Natural News – In the midst of the 15th-century Black Plague, a group of spice traders turned thieves defied the odds, robbing plague victims and their graves without succumbing to the deadly disease. Their secret? A potent blend of essential oils that protected them from infection. A new study links unvaccinated women near COVID-19-vaccinated individuals to menstrual irregularities, suggesting possible vaccine “shedding.” The study raises concerns about mRNA vaccine safety and the lack of pre-rollout shedding studies. Critics highlight censorship of women reporting menstrual changes and call for transparency in vaccine research. Researchers urge further investigation into vaccine component transmission and emphasize the need for informed consent. In a groundbreaking study published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, researchers uncovered a startling connection: Unvaccinated women who were in close proximity to individuals who received COVID-19 vaccines reported experiencing menstrual irregularities similar to those reported by vaccinated women. Unvaccinated women who were in close proximity to individuals who received COVID-19 vaccines reported experiencing menstrual irregularities similar to those reported by vaccinated women. The findings, which suggest the possibility of vaccine “shedding,” have reignited debates over the safety of mRNA vaccines and the Biden administration’s aggressive push for mass vaccination without adequate long-term testing. The study, led by researchers including Dr. Brian Hooker, Chief Scientific Officer of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), analyzed survey data from 3,390 unvaccinated women with no prior COVID-19 infection. Of these women, 85.5% reported being within six feet of a vaccinated person, and 71.7% experienced irregular menstrual symptoms within one week of exposure. The study’s authors noted that the timing and severity of these symptoms were statistically significant, raising questions about whether vaccine components could be transmitted from vaccinated to unvaccinated individuals. The study found that unvaccinated women who had daily close contact with vaccinated individuals outside their households were at the highest risk of menstrual irregularities, including heavier bleeding (34%), early period onset (28%), and extended bleeding (26%). Interestingly, women who lived with vaccinated partners or household members did not show the same increased risk, suggesting that environmental factors or prolonged exposure to larger groups of vaccinated individuals may play a role. Dr. Hooker emphasized that while the study does not definitively prove vaccine shedding, it provides compelling evidence that warrants further investigation. “This important study affirms that women exposed to individuals outside their household who received modified mRNA jabs for COVID-19 indeed experienced significantly higher levels of menstrual issues…” he told The Defender. Vaccine mandates and censorship put women at risk The study’s findings have reignited criticism of the Biden administration’s handling of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. The administration and its allies on social media platforms actively silenced women who reported menstrual irregularities following vaccination. In 2021, a Facebook group with over 20,000 members sharing personal testimonies about menstrual changes was abruptly deleted, stifling crucial conversations about vaccine safety. Tiffany Parotto, founder of MyCycleStory and a co-author of the study, highlighted the importance of giving women a voice. “The need to research these occurrences and give a voice to the women who were silenced was obvious,” she wrote. The study also raises questions about the lack of pre-rollout shedding studies for mRNA vaccines. Nicolas Hulscher, an epidemiologist at the McCullough Foundation, pointed out that the FDA issued guidance for shedding studies in 2015 for gene therapies but failed to apply the same standards to COVID-19 vaccines. “Why didn’t our regulatory agencies conduct shedding studies before mass product rollout?” he asked. The study’s authors called for increased funding and research into the potential transmission of vaccine components, emphasizing the need for transparency and informed consent. Dr. Pierre Kory, president emeritus of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, described the findings as “highly compelling” and urged regulatory agencies to take immediate action. Heather Ray, a science and research analyst with CHD, criticized the systemic gaslighting of women who reported adverse effects. “Over the past four years, women have continually been gaslighted, censored, and silenced by the media, the medical system, and government agencies regarding their experiences with the COVID-19 shot,” she said. The study’s findings underscore the need for a more cautious and transparent approach to vaccine development and distribution. While the Biden administration and social media platforms have dismissed concerns about menstrual irregularities, this research highlights the importance of listening to women’s experiences and conducting thorough safety studies before mandating experimental treatments. As the debate over vaccine safety continues, one thing is clear: women’s health should never be an afterthought. Sources for this article include: X.com ChildrensHealthDefense.org ChildrensHealthDefense.org To read the original article, click here

The post COVID-19 Vaccine Shedding? New Research Concerns Over Menstrual Abnormalities appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Yale Study Finds Spike Proteins from COVID Jabs Persist for TWO YEARS: Are mRNA Vaccines Rewriting Human DNA?

The AHA! Team — Mon, 17 Feb 2025 06:06:15 +0000

Lance D Johnson via Natural News – Researchers find spike proteins in vaccinated individuals TWO YEARS after inoculation. Yale scientists find COVID spike protein in vaccinated individuals up to two years post-vaccination. Study suggests mRNA genetic material may integrate with human DNA, activating protein-making structures. Renowned scientist Dr. Akiko Iwasaki, who initially supported mRNA vaccines, now leads the study. Vaccine skeptics warn of DNA contamination risks, citing evidence of self-replicating mRNA and reverse transcription. Research reveals mRNA vaccines may induce chronic inflammation, blood clotting, and neurological damage. Findings challenge claims of temporary, localized mRNA effects, raising concerns about long-term health impacts. Evidence suggests vaccinated individuals may become “super spreaders” of spike proteins, potentially endangering public health. Researchers find spike proteins in vaccinated individuals TWO YEARS after inoculation Scientists are raising alarms about the long-term consequences of these experimental COVID-19 injections. New findings from Yale University suggest that the genetic material in mRNA vaccines may not only persist in the human body but could also integrate with human DNA, fundamentally altering our genetic code. This disturbing discovery has profound implications for the health of billions of people worldwide and raises urgent questions about the ethics and safety of mRNA vaccine technology. Yale researchers have identified COVID spike proteins in the blood of vaccinated individuals — up to two years after they received their shots. Crucially, these individuals were never infected with the virus, as confirmed by antibody tests. The immune system typically destroys newly produced spike proteins, but the persistence of these proteins suggests that some vaccinated individuals may be producing them independently. A plausible explanation is that the genetic material delivered by the vaccines has integrated with human genes, activating protein-making structures within cells. If confirmed, this would mark a seismic shift in our understanding of mRNA vaccine safety. The implications of this discovery are staggering. More than a billion people worldwide have received mRNA COVID vaccines, and the possibility that these vaccines are altering human DNA is a game-changer. The consequences could extend far beyond the immediate health risks of Covid-19, potentially leading to chronic inflammation, autoimmune disorders, and long-term organ damage. The spike proteins produced by these vaccines are not benign; they are known to cause blood clotting, neurological inflammation, and even prion-like formations in the brain, which are linked to Alzheimer’s disease. The lead researcher on this groundbreaking study is Dr. Akiko Iwasaki, a renowned immunologist and former president of the American Association of Immunologists. Dr. Iwasaki was once a vocal advocate for mRNA vaccines, dismissing concerns about their safety as “absurd.” However, her team’s findings now suggest that those concerns may have been valid all along. The study, known as LISTEN, began in 2022 and has enrolled approximately 3,000 participants who reported post-vaccine injuries. The researchers have found spike proteins in participants’ blood samples more than 700 days after their last mRNA shot, a finding that challenges the narrative of temporary, localized mRNA effects. Welcome to the dark side of transhumanism The possibility of genetic integration is not a new concern among vaccine skeptics. Some researchers have long warned that the mRNA vaccines could contaminate human DNA, a process known as “transfection.” The manufacturing process of mRNA vaccines involves the use of DNA plasmids, which can lead to small amounts of DNA contamination in the final product. While federal standards limit allowable DNA contamination to 10 nano grams per dose, the lipid nanoparticles used to protect the mRNA may also shield the DNA contaminants, potentially allowing them to integrate into human genes. Recent research by Kevin McKernan and others has provided further evidence of DNA contamination in vaccine vials, raising questions about the adequacy of current regulatory standards. Dr. Richard M. Fleming, a nuclear cardiologist, has also warned that mRNA vaccines are self-replicating and may turn individuals into “never-ending spike protein factories.” His research suggests that the genetic sequence for SARS-CoV-2 is designed to self-assemble and self-amplify, integrating into human DNA through reverse transcription. This process could hijack healthy genetic expression, leading to chronic inflammation and organ damage for years to come. The consequences of these findings are nothing short of alarming. Vaccinated individuals may not only suffer long-term health consequences but could also become “super spreaders” of spike proteins, potentially endangering public health for generations. The idea that mRNA vaccines could rewrite human DNA and turn individuals into perpetual bioweapon vectors is a chilling prospect, one that aligns with the emerging field of transhumanism. As genetic updates become the norm, the line between human and machine blurs, raising ethical questions about autonomy, consent, and the future of humanity. Sources include: AlexBerensen.substack.com Medicine.Yale.edu NaturalNews.com To read the original article, click here

The post Yale Study Finds Spike Proteins from COVID Jabs Persist for TWO YEARS: Are mRNA Vaccines Rewriting Human DNA? appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

An Old Drug with New Tricks: Hydroxychloroquine

The AHA! Team — Tue, 04 Feb 2025 06:24:47 +0000

Medical University of South Carolina via EurekAlert! – The anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine shows promise against cancer, but cancer cells often develop resistance. A new study from MUSC Hollings Cancer Center researchers discovered how, setting the stage for new combination therapies As the hunt for effective cancer therapies intensifies, some scientists are turning back to look at old drugs in a new light. The anti-malarial hydroxychloroquine is one such drug that has been “repurposed” to fight cancer. Despite its effectiveness at blocking the resupply of needed resources to cancer cells, clinical trial results have been disappointing, in part because cancer cells eventually become resistant to the drug. A Medical University of South Carolina Hollings Cancer Center team led by Joe Delaney, Ph.D., reports in Cell Cycle that resistance to hydroxychloroquine occurs not by restoring the cancer cells’ recycling ability, as had been expected. Rather, resistance develops due to changes in the division, metabolism and export pathways of cancer cells. These findings open the door for new combination treatments, as drugs targeting these newly identified resistance mechanisms can be administered along with hydroxychloroquine to improve outcomes. The promise of repurposed drugs Repurposing old drugs for new treatments is not a new concept. Aspirin was originally used as a painkiller, but after the discovery of its anti-coagulant properties, it was repurposed as a blood thinner to treat heart disease. Thalidomide, the infamous anti-nausea medication, has been recently repurposed as a treatment for certain types of cancer and even leprosy. As cancer therapy moves increasingly toward specific single-protein targets, some scientists, like Delaney, are swinging back to look at preexisting drugs to find robust, multi-target effects. “Targeting single proteins can be extremely effective to treat cancer,” said Delaney. “However, the more specific the treatment becomes, the more likely resistance is to occur.” Imagine a hotel hallway, and behind each door is a route for cancer development. Targeting single proteins is like welding one of the doors shut. It’s impossible to get through that door, but it’s just a matter of time before cancer picks the lock on another door and gets in. That’s why these old drugs are so promising, said Delaney – their breadth of targets padlocks several doors at once, making it that much harder for a cancer cell to work around them. “These older molecules usually work because they have many, many targets within the cell,” he said. “If we can figure out how to use them correctly, it’s harder for cancer cells to mutate all those different points that they are acting on.” The cancer-fighting promise and limitations of hydroxychloroquine Originally used as a treatment for malaria, hydroxychloroquine began to be explored as a cancer therapy in the mid-2000s. The drug is known to block autophagy, a process that essentially acts as a cell’s clean-up crew. Autophagy literally means “self-eating.” It enables cancer cells to gather up old or damaged cellular machinery and send it off either to be thrown out or recycled. “When we think of cancer, we think of uncontrolled dividing cells,” said Delaney. “Autophagy is one of those processes that really enables a cancer cell to do just that by resupplying it with resources needed for survival and division.” Despite the drug’s promise of killing cancer cells by blocking cellular recycling, most clinical trials using the drug have been disappointing. “What we don’t know is why so many of these clinical trials have failed,” said Delaney. “We’re trying to figure out why hydroxychloroquine works or doesn’t work in certain situations in cancer.” A surprising finding about resistance to hydroxychloroquine To answer these questions, researchers in the Delaney Lab embarked on a multi-omics exploration into hydroxychloroquine’s effect on ovarian and colorectal cancer cells. They treated cells with hydroxychloroquine and then used two different whole-genome screens to identify exactly what the cells were doing to evade hydroxychloroquine attacks. With these approaches, they were able to observe how cells activated or deactivated different cellular pathways in response to continued hydroxychloroquine exposure. “By using two completely different methods, we were able to home in on the true biological players in the system,” said Delaney. The researchers were surprised to find that cells weren’t modifying autophagy to survive –the door that was expected to be opened really wasn’t touched at all. Instead, cancer cells were surviving hydroxychloroquine by changing their metabolism, division and export pathways. “We thought the main interaction of hydroxychloroquine with cancer was this process of autophagy, but it appears instead that processes unrelated to autophagy may be the most important for cancer cells to survive this therapy,” said Delaney. Setting the stage for novel combination therapies With this discovery, the Hollings team hopes to identify drugs that could be administered along with hydroxychloroquine to prevent the cancer cells from becoming resistant to this therapy. “Our study has identified the potential mechanisms that we will need to target with a second drug to prevent resistance against hydroxychloroquine,” said Delaney. Combining hydroxychloroquine with drugs that affect cell division, metabolism or export could increase the effectiveness of the treatment. Additionally, using hydroxychloroquine to treat patients with cancers that already have defects in one of these newly identified pathways could be a very powerful intervention. Finally, patients without these defects could be directed to potentially more effective, less resistant treatments. “We certainly want to understand which patients would see the most benefit to get the best result from these trials,” Delaney said. Ultimately, these results from the Delaney Lab shed light on how repurposed drugs like hydroxychloroquine can be used to fight cancer more effectively. Specifically, they show that cancer cells resist hydroxychloroquine in unexpected ways. By using such information, scientists can create more effective combination treatments against cancer. # # # About MUSC Hollings Cancer Center MUSC Hollings Cancer Center is South Carolina’s only National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center with the largest academic-based cancer research program in the state. With more than 150 faculty cancer scientists and 20 academic departments, it has an annual research funding portfolio of more than $50 million and sponsors more than 200 clinical trials across the state. Hollings offers state-of-the-art cancer screenings, diagnostic capabilities, therapies and surgical techniques within its multidisciplinary clinics to provide the full range of cancer care. Dedicated to preventing and reducing the cancer burden statewide, the Hollings Office of Community Outreach and Engagement works with community organizations to bring cancer education and prevention information to affected populations. For more information, visit hollingscancercenter.musc.edu Journal Cell Cycle DOI 10.1080/15384101.2024.2402191 To read the original article click here.

The post An Old Drug with New Tricks: Hydroxychloroquine appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Kansas Sues Pfizer for Misleading the Public About the Risks of its mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines

The AHA! Team — Wed, 02 Oct 2024 08:06:39 +0000

Cassie B. via Natural News – The state of Kansas has filed a consumer protection lawsuit against the pharmaceutical company Pfizer, accusing it of misleading the public when it comes to both the safety and efficacy of its highly controversial mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. According to the suit, Pfizer knew that its vaccine came with significant adverse effects and manipulated its safety trials in order to deceive the public, violating Kansas’s consumer protection laws as well as previous consent judgments. The suit cites a slew of supporting evidence, including scientific and government research, press releases, interviews, and news reports demonstrating Pfizer’s misdeeds. According to the suit, Pfizer knew that its vaccine came with significant adverse effects and manipulated its safety trials For example, they cited a paper from the New England Journal of Medicine and an FDA memo to support the allegation that Pfizer purposely destroyed the control group of a COVID vaccine trial by providing participants with access to the jab. This made it impossible to fairly evaluate the safety of the vaccine by comparing a vaccinated group to one that was not vaccinated, the lawsuit alleges. In addition, they cited two articles from the British Medical Journal indicating that Pfizer delayed the release of vaccine trial data intentionally and only tested healthy patients in its vaccine trials in a marked departure from what is considered protocol. They cited two articles from the British Medical Journal indicating that Pfizer delayed the release of vaccine trial data intentionally To support their allegation that the company purposefully misrepresented the vaccine’s safety, they included press releases from Pfizer and interviews with CEO Albert Bourla in which the vaccine is presented as safe and effective. The lawsuit also refers to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by the watchdog group Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency in America with the FDA, through which they obtained information about the vaccine. From this FOIA suit, the group acquired an internal Pfizer database listing adverse events that was never shared with the public and contained far more incidents than those listed in the public-facing Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. In total, the internal database showed nearly 160,000 adverse events, along with more than 1,200 fatalities among the millions of people who received the vaccine as of February 2021. Heart problems and pregnancy complications weren’t disclosed to public The lawsuit also focused on specific health issues that have been coming to light since the vaccine rollout, such as heart problems. Not long after the vaccine started being administered to young people, it became apparent that it was having an adverse effect on their hearts, particularly young men. Myocarditis, which occurs when the middle layer of the heart’s wall becomes inflamed, can weaken the organ and has the potential to cause heart failure. The lawsuit alleges: “Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public.” Another point of concern cited by the lawsuit is the dangers of the vaccine in pregnant women. It maintains that the company knew from a study that rat fetuses had trouble getting pregnant and implanting embryos and that their fetuses suffered malformations yet insisted to the public that the jab did not present any risk to pregnant women. The rat study was another revelation from the FOIA lawsuit, but the Kansas lawsuit also notes that Pfizer’s own data showed that tens of thousands of women experienced menstrual irregularities after getting the jab as of spring 2022. Kansas attorney general Kris Kobach told the National Review in an interview that the state’s Consumer Protection Act is designed to prevent consumers from being deceived by companies like Pfizer. “They had extraordinary success marketing their vaccine in the state of Kansas and more generally across the globe, and I think that had consumers had this information, many of them might have made a different choice,” he asserted. Sources for this article include: ArmageddonProse.Substack.com NationalReview.com To read the original article, click here: https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-09-20-kansas-sues-pfizer-misleading-public-risks-vaccines.html

The post Kansas Sues Pfizer for Misleading the Public About the Risks of its mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Are You Aware That You’re Inhaling Toxic Chemicals When You Wear a Face Mask?

The AHA! Team — Fri, 30 Aug 2024 08:55:30 +0000

Olivia Cook via Natural News – Wearing face masks has become a global norm following the onset of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, with many governments around the world often mandating these coverings for people in public. But recent research reveals concerning findings about their safety. Masks, especially surgical and reusable FFF types have been found to emit potentially harmful chemical compounds. A study published in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety in April 2024 highlighted that masks could release up to almost 5,400 microplastic particles in 24 hours, with surgical masks emitting more than 3,150 microfibers in under an hour. Masks could release up to almost 5,400 microplastic particles in 24 hours Researchers from Germany and Switzerland reviewed 24 studies, involving more than 630 masks, including cloth, N95 and surgical varieties. They discovered that 63 percent of the masks released alarming amounts of microplastics and nanoplastics, organophosphate esters and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons compared to other mask types. (Related: N95 masks expose wearers to dangerous levels of toxic cancer- and seizure-causing compounds, study finds.) Meanwhile, surgical masks were linked to higher emissions of heavy metals, phthalates and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) similar to textile masks. Some of the detected substances, such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), titanium dioxide (TiO2) and VOCs, were found to exceed safe exposure limits. A 2022 study published in Nature also raised concerns about TiO2, a potential carcinogen, urging stricter regulations. Study finds plasticizers, heavy metals, PFAS and VOCs in face masks A recent study published in Environment International examined four types of face masks to identify the presence of 31 plasticizers and to assess how much of these compounds could be inhaled during use. Plasticizers are plastic-derived substances added to materials during the manufacturing process to make them softer and more flexible. Although all mask types had similar overall plasticizer levels, the study found that surgical and FFF2 masks commonly used in Europe have the highest plasticizer release rates at almost four percent and nearly five percent, respectively. The Environmental and Water Chemistry for Human Health group conducted the research at the Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research in Barcelona, Spain. The researchers highlighted that most face masks are made from synthetic materials, like polypropylene, polystyrene terephthalate and polyester, with plasticizers added to enhance fire resistance, flexibility and softness. Heavy metals, PFAS and VOCs were found in others. To simulate real-life mask use, the researchers conducted inhalation experiments using paper mache dummy heads. Higher temperatures – resembling human breath – led to increased release of plastic additives. Release rates varied significantly, ranging from 0.1 percent to 95 percent, depending on the compound and mask type. Notably, organophosphate esters and phthalates showed average release rates of 1.0 percent and 1.2 percent, respectively. Surgical and FFF2 masks had the highest overall release rates, while reusable masks showed the lowest at 0.6 percent. N95 masks had a 1.2 percent release rate. One concerning finding was a surgical mask that released 95 percent of a compound called acetyl tributyl citrate, a potential endocrine disruptor. Surgical and FFF2 masks had the highest overall release rates While the released plasticizer levels remained below established safety thresholds, the researchers emphasized that face masks represent an additional exposure pathway. The study warns that even at low levels, exposure to plasticizers poses genotoxic (DNA damage), immunotoxic (affects the immune system) and teratogenic (causes birth defects) risks, especially for vulnerable groups, such as children and pregnant women. Additionally, plasticizers have been linked to declining sperm counts and potential fertility issues, raising concerns about their impact on future generations. Watch the following video showing how disposable surgical face masks are made of synthetic fibers that can enter the body. This video is from the Daily Videos channel on Brighteon.com. Sources include: TheEpochTimes.com ScienceDirect.com 1 Nature.com ScienceDirect.com 2 ScienceDirect.com 3 Brighteon.com To read the original article, click here: https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-08-15-dangerous-chemicals-inhaling-when-wearing-face-masks.html

The post Are You Aware That You’re Inhaling Toxic Chemicals When You Wear a Face Mask? appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Research Underway on Young Adults Experiencing Myocarditis After COVID Vaccine

AHA Publisher — Mon, 05 Dec 2022 08:00:17 +0000

Steve Warren via CBN News – Researchers are looking into cases of serious side effects occurring in some young adults after they received a COVID-19 vaccination, including the possibility of myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle. In the U.S. since late 2020, there have been around 1,000 known reports of vaccine-related myocarditis or pericarditis in children under age 18, primarily young males, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). But the CDC does not have data on the number of cases of young adults in their 20s, which has become an age group of particular concern. NBC News was the first mainstream media outlet to admit last month to the possible link between the COVID vaccines and myocarditis in young adults. The first research trials are finally underway in the U.S. to monitor these side effects. Both drugmakers who developed the COVID-19 vaccines, Moderna and Pfizer are involved. Moderna has already started two studies. Pfizer is preparing to launch another in the next couple of months that will include up to 500 teens and young adults under age 21, according to NBC News. The Food and Drug Administration has now made the studies compulsory for the companies to weigh the possible long-term effects of myocarditis. Early research conclusions could be published next year, the outlet reported. An FDA official told NBC News the chance of having myocarditis occur following vaccination is “very low.” Other Instances of Vaccine Complications Newly released data obtained from the CDC also shows the first people to receive the COVID-19 vaccines, like healthcare workers, did report a high rate of serious complications after receiving the shot. Just the News reports among the 10 million-plus users of the agency’s v-safe active monitoring smartphone app through July — 8.5 million of whom signed up between December 2020 and April 2021, before all adults were eligible for COVID vaccines — nearly 8% said they required medical care after receiving the vaccines. The data was acquired by the Informed Consent Action Network. It received the information after filing a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the CDC. According to the Department of Health and Human Services, more than 7,500 claims have been filed alleging serious injury from the COVID-19 vaccines as of Nov. 1. There may also be a problem with vaccine booster shots as well. Last January, an original study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) reported about the risk of myocarditis after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination. “Based on passive surveillance reporting in the US, the risk of myocarditis after receiving mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines was increased across multiple age and sex strata and was highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males and young men,” the study said. As CBN News reported in October, Florida’s Surgeon General, Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo issued new guidance regarding mRNA shots, warning they are associated with an 84% increase in cardiac-related adverse events among males 18-39 years old. While the Florida study wasn’t published in a peer-reviewed journal, Ladapo contends the study, along with other peer-reviewed research that points to similar results, indicates young males in this age range could be at risk from those types of vaccines. Symptoms of myocarditis include: Chest pain Shortness of breath Feelings of having a fast-beating, fluttering or pounding heart To read the original article click here.

The post Research Underway on Young Adults Experiencing Myocarditis After COVID Vaccine appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.

Melatonin Could Be a Potential Therapy for Long-COVID Symptoms

AHA Publisher — Thu, 17 Nov 2022 08:00:30 +0000

Dr. Chinta Sidharthan via News-Medical – A recent review published in the journal Biomolecules discussed the potential uses of melatonin in treating brain fog and chronic fatigue syndrome or myalgic encephalomyelitis symptoms associated with long coronavirus disease (COVID). Background An emerging concern associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is long COVID or clinical sequelae consisting of chronic fatigue, memory loss, muscle weakness, reduced pulmonary capacity during exertion, persistent fever, myalgia, epileptic seizures, stroke, and other cardiovascular complications. Patients who have recovered from severe COVID-19 experience these debilitating symptoms for months after recovery. Furthermore, studies that examined vaccinated individuals who experienced breakthrough severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections found a high incidence of long COVID symptoms such as deteriorated musculoskeletal, neurological, and mental health among these individuals after recovery. This indicates that vaccination provides only limited protection against long COVID. Melatonin is a cryoprotective hormone and chemical that exhibits anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immunoregulatory activity and has been seen to impair viral infections, play a role in circadian rhythm maintenance, and be effective against diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases. It is also involved in the activation of glutathione-synthesizing enzymes. Melatonin could potentially be a therapeutic agent in treating long COVID symptoms. Long COVID Symptoms Brain fog is a general term used to defineimpaired cognitive function, such as difficulty concentrating, loss of working and short-term memory, and difficulty with verbal and non-verbal methods of learning and mathematical problem-solving. While brain fog can be a consequence of various factors such as sleep deprivation, malnutrition, pregnancy or menopause-related hormonal changes, or even chemotherapy, it was the most reported symptom among COVID-19-recovering patients with no history of other diseases or hypoxia. An intelligence test in the United Kingdom detected cognitive impairments in a significant number of individuals with COVID-19. Symptoms included memory loss, disorientation, and reduced mental energy. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is characterized by excessive and persistent fatigue, inability to perform physical exercise, and autonomic dysregulation. ME/CFS is also associated with disruption of circadian rhythms and the gut/mucosal barrier, mitochondrial dysfunction, and a pro-inflammatory state. Studies indicated that 45% of COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized and required intensive care unit admission exhibited ME/CFS symptoms up to six months after recovery. Melatonin as a Potential Long COVID Treatment Melatonin is a hormone naturally produced in all aerobically respiring life forms, and it performs antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immunostimulant, and neuroprotective functions in the body. It reduces the pro-inflammatory response of macrophages, activates nuclear erythroid 2-related factor 2, and suppresses the activation of nuclear factor (NF)-κB. Melatonin is also known to balance inflammatory responses by decreasing the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukins (IL) 1β, 6, and 8, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and increasing anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. Warburg’s effect during viral infections causes a shift from mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis which occurs in the cytoplasm. This is accompanied by inflammation-promoting mechanisms such as an increase in NF-κB and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α. Consequently, the anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages are converted to pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages, causing a cytokine storm known to cause endothelial tissue and organ damage in severe COVID-19 patients. The anti-inflammatory effects of melatonin in preventing pro-inflammatory profiles or macrophages and suppressing NF-κB activation can help reverse Warburg’s effect in long COVID patients. Melatonin also regulates the amyloid β (Aβ) metabolism associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Studies with transgenic Alzheimer’s disease models have shown that melatonin can control neuroinflammation by interacting with Aβ40 and Aβ42 and increasing protein degradation. Furthermore, the ability of melatonin to regulate circadian rhythms and sleep patterns has been shown to improve cognitive function and sleep in patients in the early stages of cognitive decline. Melatonin is also known to exhibit therapeutic activity against the various symptoms of ME/CFS, such as oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory state, mitochondrial and bioenergetic dysregulation, and disruption of the gut/mucosal barrier. Conclusions Overall, the review reported the significant potential for the use of melatonin in long-COVID and COVID-19 therapy. Studies have shown melatonin is more effective in reducing COVID-19 inflammatory markers than commonly used SARS-CoV-2 antivirals. The authors believe that although melatonin exhibits anti-inflammatory and immunostimulant properties that many studies have reported being effective against COVID-19, it has not been promoted as a therapeutic option, possibly due to its easy availability and non-patentability, which makes it an unattractive target for pharmaceutical industries. They recommend clinical trials to explore the use of melatonin as a treatment for long COVID symptoms. To read the original article click here.

The post Melatonin Could Be a Potential Therapy for Long-COVID Symptoms appeared first on Amazing Health Advances.